Martin,
Thanks for the link. This is one of those strange cases where the
project could be considered a part of MyFaces or it could be
considered a new subproject. I think either way, this definitely has to
go before the incubator PMC.
I did talk with Michael Freedman (the JSR-301project
I will post a mail questioning whether this code-grant can come in via
IPC or as an incubation project to the incubator list.
regards,
Martin
On 7/26/07, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
Thanks for the link. This is one of those strange cases where the
project could be
From: Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin,
Thanks for the link. This is one of those strange cases where the
project could be considered a part of MyFaces or it could be
considered a new subproject. I think either way, this definitely has to
go before the incubator PMC.
I did
jup,
I have something more sitting in my queue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-13
(when it arrives, I will handle this)
-Matthias
On 7/26/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is some further information on Intellectual Property Clearance.
Here is some further information on Intellectual Property Clearance.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
regards,
Martin
On 7/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can move in
the
code. The old
Hi guys,
this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can move in the
code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code grant.
The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that so far has
developed the code is structured.
Main question: Can and will
Cool Matthias, thanks. I'll make sure we have that all filled out by
the time I get the code.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
that would be nice.
@Software-Grant: Schedule B of CCLA is in Omar's hands (at Oracle),
the update is simple
-Matthias
On 7/26/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that would be nice.
@Software-Grant: Schedule B of CCLA is in Omar's hands (at Oracle),
the update is simple
-Matthias
On 7/26/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post a mail questioning whether this code-grant can come in via
IPC or as an incubation project to the incubator
this is exceptionally great news. The question is now how we can move in the
code. The old question that arises now is incubator versus code grant.
even a software grant has be to discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well.
The question that we'll need to answer is how the community that so far
Hello everyone,
This is a heads up. As you may or may not know, the JSR-301 EG and
Oracle (who is leading the project) has been trying to move the JSR-301
R.I. Development branch to Apache. In particular Apache MyFaces. I am
please to announce that Oracle has gotten all the approvals it
believe the TCK will be developed in-house at Oracle, but the
development of the 301 bridge itself will be done as part of MyFaces
community.
Hello Scott. Does Oracle have control of the TCK licensing? If so, what
are the chances of having anonymous read access to the code, and a license
One more comment, the unit tests that will hopefully be made as part of
the Maven build will be developed as part of this project and I have
hopes they will be a lot more comprehensive then the tests provided by
the TCK. :) That's up to the community to help with that however.
Scott
Scott
I'll double check, but I think the TCK will be liscenced using the
Apache 2.0, it's just that Oracle will maintain the copyrights. As per
agreements with the JCP, the TCK can only enforce the specification
which is developed by the Java Community EG. I know Martin is on the
Expert Group
Dennis,
I checked with the project lead for JSR-301 and he said licensing for
the TCK is still up in the air. It is his intention to publish it under
the Apache 2.0 license but I believe he is still trying to work out the
logistics with Sun to make sure that Oracle can comply with the JCP.
14 matches
Mail list logo
