Hi guys,
let me weigh in on the filter question: please, no filter!
@prefix suffix mappings: you can get the registered mappings
in previous servlet versions: parsing the web.xml
in servlet 3.0: via the API
http://download.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/servlet/ServletRegistration.html
the
Hi Martin,
Thank you so much for your mail!
This is exactly my point of view about the ResourceHandler. However,
Leonardo in I kinda got into a fight about it and unfortunately, I
do not have time for that right now!
Leonardo, please reconsider my reasoning from the previous mails of
this
Hi
2011/6/30 Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org:
Hi guys,
let me weigh in on the filter question: please, no filter!
@prefix suffix mappings: you can get the registered mappings
in previous servlet versions: parsing the web.xml
in servlet 3.0: via the API
Hi Jakob
2011/6/30 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi Martin,
Thank you so much for your mail!
This is exactly my point of view about the ResourceHandler. However,
Leonardo in I kinda got into a fight about it and unfortunately, I
do not have time for that right now!
For me this is
[...] The new alternative proposed is similar.
This alternative is not new! My first version of the
AdvancedResourceHandler (before you started committing) already did
exactly this! (However, assuming /faces/* as mapping if the page was
accessed via suffix mapping, but making it configurable
2011/6/30 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
[...] The new alternative proposed is similar.
This alternative is not new! My first version of the
AdvancedResourceHandler (before you started committing) already did
exactly this! (However, assuming /faces/* as mapping if the page was
Hm, you're not getting it. This
To do it correctly we need to detect if this is a servlet 3.0
container and do the necessary stuff, but we need to test what happen
if a 2.5 or 2.4 web.xml file is deployed on a 3.0 container.
Additionally, we need to take care about do not call 3.0 code in 2.5
2011/6/30 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hm, you're not getting it. This
To do it correctly we need to detect if this is a servlet 3.0
container and do the necessary stuff, but we need to test what happen
if a 2.5 or 2.4 web.xml file is deployed on a 3.0 container.
Additionally, we
hi @ all,
what jakob is talking about makes a lot of sense to me.
@jakob:
please don't fork it.
imo we should continue with the approach started by jakob + the
addition mentioned by martin. after finishing that we can think about
further improvements (if needed at all).
@leo:
do you feel we
2011/6/30 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
hi @ all,
what jakob is talking about makes a lot of sense to me.
@jakob:
please don't fork it.
imo we should continue with the approach started by jakob + the
addition mentioned by martin. after finishing that we can think about
ok - so please start a vote about it.
describe the topic and why you think something has to be changed
(compared to the original commit in combination with the addition
mentioned by martin).
please write it very concisely! we won't get a lot of votes, if the
description is too verbose.
thx
Hi
Ok, I already send it. I hope it is clear the problem we are discussing about.
@Jakob: do you have any other issue related to the current
implementation done in myfaces-commons-resourcehandler that we need to
take a decision?
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/6/30 Gerhard Petracek
Hi
In the last days this enhancements were commited:
--
Added GZIP compression to ExtendedResourceHandler and these params:
/**
* Enable or disable gzip compressions for resources served by
this extended
Hi Leonardo,
Because set prefix and suffix mapping for the same webapp could lead
to inconsistencies.
Which inconsistencies exactly? Please give an example, I can't really
think of any!
[...] If a page is rendered using suffix mapping,
resource paths will use that and not prefix mapping,
Hi Jakob
2011/6/14 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi Leonardo,
Because set prefix and suffix mapping for the same webapp could lead
to inconsistencies.
Which inconsistencies exactly? Please give an example, I can't really
think of any!
Let's take a look to
Hi
I committed on myfaces-commons-resourcehandler module on trunk an
alternative solution for this issue. It is still not complete, so the
idea is discuss it. See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MFCOMMONS-33
From previous discussion, on AdvancedResource handler we have:
a. relative
Hi Leo,
Overall this seems nice, thanks!
However, I have some comments on your solution:
1) If I have to configure a Filter in web.xml I can just as good
define a prefix mapping for the FacesServlet. I don't see why an
additional Filter is better than an additional servlet-mapping. So why
Hi Jakob
2011/6/13 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi Leo,
Overall this seems nice, thanks!
However, I have some comments on your solution:
1) If I have to configure a Filter in web.xml I can just as good
define a prefix mapping for the FacesServlet. I don't see why an
additional
Hi Jakob
2011/5/17 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi Leo,
Thanks!
Some comments to your ideas:
- Resource caching (just like myfaces core does!).
This is already implemented and it actually goes one step further,
because it uses GZIP compression too!
I was thinking on do
Hi Leo,
Thanks!
Some comments to your ideas:
- Resource caching (just like myfaces core does!).
This is already implemented and it actually goes one step further,
because it uses GZIP compression too!
- Find a better name for advanced-resources.xml. It is ok, but I'll
prefer a more
Hi
This stuff looks very promising. I think we can additionally implement
the following ideas:
- Relocate resources and replace library names. For example, if my
custom component uses prototype library and I have to use other jsf
component library that loads prototype.js with its custom library
Hi,
I just committed the code, see r1079447.
In addition, I created the following issue for reference in the jira:
MFCOMMONS-29.
Feel free to look at it, use it, change it,... - input is always welcome :)
Regards,
Jakob
2011/2/23 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi guys,
I developed
Hi guys,
I developed a custom JSF 2 ResourceHandler for one of my current
projects and I want to donate it to MyFaces commons (JSF 2 branch).
The features of this ResourceHandler include the following:
- relative paths between resources (css files referencing images
without using
23 matches
Mail list logo
