Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-21 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi Werner, Now I am not sure which is better. Tag soup or attribute soup ;) Best regards, Martin Am 20.12.2012 um 08:37 schrieb Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com: I am not sure if it really makes sense to offload attributes into separate tags unless they are common to more than one

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-20 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I agree with Werner. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: I am not sure if it really makes sense to offload attributes into separate tags unless they are common to more than one component. Aka styleClass and style yes, currentDayCellClass etc... definitely

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-19 Thread Werner Punz
Mhh shall we integrate this? I personally think it would make sense with some name changes. Werner Am 17.12.12 18:54, schrieb Jon Bionda: Sorry for what is likely a breach of protocol. This is a suggestion on how to make the Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG compliant. WCAG being a standard for

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-19 Thread Werner Punz
Ok just to be more precise, I have integrated the changes now locally, but I am not committing them yet, because it would mean to introduce another set of attributes to the Calendar yet. I just want the opinion whether we should do it. Just to give s small description, the attributes would add

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-19 Thread Leonardo Uribe
+1 I think the proposal looks good, the names used in the properties are ok, and there is certainty that the changes are useful. regards, Leonardo 2012/12/19 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com: Ok just to be more precise, I have integrated the changes now locally, but I am not committing them

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-19 Thread Grant Smith
+1 The benefits outweigh the overcrowding of attributes, in my opinion. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote: +1 I think the proposal looks good, the names used in the properties are ok, and there is certainty that the changes are useful. regards,

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-19 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi guys, I had the idea once that one could have an extra embedded style tag which goes with each one of the extended components. So you could embed this tag, and set the style attributes there, and the main component would stay clean. Wdyt? best regards, Martin On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:55

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-19 Thread Cagatay Civici
Hi, I decided to go with a javascript bundle in PF as calendar is a special component in terms or localization and internationalization. http://code.google.com/p/primefaces/wiki/PrimeFacesLocales Regards, Cagatay Civici PrimeFaces Lead Prime Teknoloji www.prime.com.tr On 19 Ara 2012, at

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-19 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi MM I had the idea once that one could have an extra embedded style tag which MM goes with each one of the extended components. So you could embed this tag, MM and set the style attributes there, and the main component would stay clean. To be more specific, the idea could be move the code

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

2012-12-19 Thread Werner Punz
I am not sure if it really makes sense to offload attributes into separate tags unless they are common to more than one component. Aka styleClass and style yes, currentDayCellClass etc... definitely not it does not make sense to introduce a tag where an attribute suffices, otherwise we will