Looks like we got 7 +1 votes, well this was not really a vote.
So, since we heard no concerns on that, should we do an official vote ?
Or just do it...
I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
-Matthias
On 7/15/07, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/14/07,
On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
Votes are cheap :-)
Best wishes,
Paul
yeah, I'll do that now :)
I guess, this topic also become more attention, when it's a vote ;)
-M
On 7/19/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:24 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
I'd prefer a vote, to be honest. Yeah, we become vote-happy :-)))
Votes are cheap :-)
Got a question here: making the JSF 1.2 core
trunk seems like a no-brainer. But what about Tomahawk
and Trinidad? Will those switch over to be JSF 1.2-based
on their trunks, or should we keep JSF 1.1 as the basis
for their trunks?
The coder in me wants to bump to JSF 1.2, but it's
hard to
Well,
we were talking about this in past, and in the past (14 month ago or
so), we agreed to keep
MyFaces 1.1.x to be the trunk. Now, we have a (first) release of
MyFaces 1.2.x out there, so it
*might* make more sense now, than in the past. However, we recently
asked, but we never heard much
I would rather switch to 1.2 now so that new users use 1.2 right away.
In a sense it's going to be better for them since they won't have a
conversion cost later. I'm currently converting an application to JSF
1.2and it's not as easy as dropping new libs in if you don't want to
have any
So I think the real issue is more with the current JSF 1.1 users. It might
be rude to switch to JSF 1.2 so fast after the first release, but I wonder
if there's good time at all for this kind of action. Personally, I don't
see any so I think the sooner the better as less harm will be done.
Of course, MyFaces is a spec implementation so bugs need to be fixed in
order to remain competitive with other providers. What I meant is more
perception-wise. Assuming someone started using MyFaces 1.1.x like one month
ago or so and downloaded the source from SVN, he might feel left out seeing
+1 on the 1.2 being trunk
Will we branch tomahawk and sandbox and make its trunk on the lines of
1.2 versioning and have the new trunk require JSF 1.2 and thus JDK
1.5? I'd be all for that. It would be nice to move off of the 1.4
restrictions.
On 7/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Well, it is 2007 :)
Dennis Byrne
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
--
Dennis Byrne
+1 as well
On 7/14/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it is 2007 :)
Dennis Byrne
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail:
+1
regards,
Martin
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 as well
On 7/14/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it is 2007 :)
Dennis Byrne
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
+1
On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
+1
On 7/15/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog:
+1
On 7/14/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/15/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Should we do it now ?
17 matches
Mail list logo
