Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-07 Thread Cagatay Civici
As a fan of cwiki, +1 for sure. The wiki converter seems to be handy. On Nov 7, 2007 3:03 AM, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We use confluence in my group, and I definitely think it will increase productivity. I totally understand we want to support open source projects, so if

Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-07 Thread Manfred Geiler
I have no real problem with the look of our current wiki. But I like the lookfeel of cwiki. So, if someone volunteers for setting up and converting I am +1 --Manfred On 11/7/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a fan of cwiki, +1 for sure. The wiki converter seems to be handy. On

Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-07 Thread Ron Smits
Reading the convertor info, looks like the person changing it will need local access to it. Is there a backup one can use? On Nov 7, 2007 12:35 PM, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no real problem with the look of our current wiki. But I like the lookfeel of cwiki. So, if someone

Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-06 Thread Gabrielle Crawford
We use confluence in my group, and I definitely think it will increase productivity. I totally understand we want to support open source projects, so if there's an open source wiki system that's as good as confluence then great, let's use that. Otherwise I'm a +1 for switching to confluence.

New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Do we want to migrate to the cwiki, that some Apache projects are using ? I am not really thrilled on doing the migration... But, what do other think about it ? -Matthias On 11/5/07, Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Understandable, but currently the wiki does not really shine in

Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-05 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Do we want to migrate to the cwiki, that some Apache projects are using ? I don't like to use a commercial product for open-source development. In fact, this also counts for JIRA, but this decision has been felt. Ciao, Mario

Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-05 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Do we want to migrate to the cwiki, that some Apache projects are using ? I don't like to use a commercial product for open-source development. In fact, this also counts for JIRA, but this decision has been felt. ... except for my IDE where I didn't manage to be as productive

Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I am using on cwiki on a daily base, and I like it more. But we need to convert the existing documentation, I am not really interested in that :-) -M On 11/5/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we want to migrate to the cwiki, that some Apache projects are using ? I don't

Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-05 Thread Ron Smits
UWC (Universal Wiki Converter) seems to be able to convert from moinmoin to confluence: http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CONFEXT/Universal+Wiki+Converter On 11/5/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using on cwiki on a daily base, and I like it more. But we need to

Re: New wiki ? (was Re: [site] new pages ?)

2007-11-05 Thread Paul McMahan
Over the past couple of years the Geronimo project has discussed this topic a lot. Now that discussion is settled and Confluence is used for practically all of the project's user facing web pages - developer wiki, user documentation, and the main project web site. As you know MoinMoin is