Mike,
As soon as Tomahawk is compatible with the JSF 1.1 spec, then it should
be considered implementation independent. If their are known
incompatibilities with an implementation, i.e. MyFaces 1.1.4, then those
should be noted in Tomahawk's release notes.
We can make the testing easer by
I think it's too soon to be making the decision on what to call the
next version. Let's wait and see how things go with a Tomahawk 1.1.5
release. We're still encountering dependency issues with current
Tomahawk releases. We've promised to deliver
implementation-dependent releases twice in
Mike,
As a part of the 1.1.5 release, the next version is set. Based on your
comments, the version should be set to 1.1.6. I have no problem with
this. The release of 1.1.5 should not be delayed while we determine the
next version number.
Paul Spencer
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
I think
Ok. I see where you're going. I also don't want 1.1.5 delayed
because of the next release version number. And even if we pick
1.1.6 now, we can release it as 1.6 later.
My preference is 1.1.6, but if I'm the only one that feels this way, use 1.6.
On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It will be set, but not in stone. You've changed the version # of
snapshots before. :)
+1 for this not being a release blocker
Paul Spencer wrote:
Mike,
As a part of the 1.1.5 release, the next version is set. Based on your
comments, the version should be set to 1.1.6. I have no problem
