Re: Public API's not part of JSF

2006-10-11 Thread Arash Rajaeeyan
Hi Matthiasis there any classes in any of those packages now?On 10/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi *The shared-impl is not really available in source. It's part of the shared. There is also a shared-tomahawk generation. Shared itself willnot be released. I wrote a small wiki

Re: Public API's not part of JSF

2006-10-11 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi * The shared-impl is not really available in source. It's part of the shared. There is also a shared-tomahawk generation. Shared itself will not be released. I wrote a small wiki page on [1] about shared. @Martin: 434 ? if so, we (Sean, Wendy and me) just spoke to some portlet guys at the

Re: Public API's not part of JSF

2006-10-11 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Yeah, I think I saw that. Now that myFaces is starting to get a number of very elaborate sub-projects, there is no real reason that we should have to keep re-inventing the wheel. Yet I can certainly respect wanting to keep the API package strictly JSF. Martin Marinschek wrote: Hi Scott,

Re: Public API's not part of JSF

2006-10-10 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi Scott, we've had re-occuring discussions about a new commons-module. This would probably be good candidate for this. Additionally, I've still got to review a commit for a module by Shinsuke Sugaya, which is about portlet compatibility - maybe it would be good to put it there. regards,