Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-14 Thread Jakob Korherr
Aggregation: +7 (+8 including myself) for the idea with the ProjectStage. Because it really is not that much of work, I will include the cyclic reference detection in my patch for MYFACES-2375. Thank you all for your contribution and a special thanks to Michael Concini for the idea with the

Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-14 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi *, Thank you all for your contribution and a special thanks to Michael Concini for the idea with the project stage! indeed a very good idea. Ed will love to see that his ProjectStage is getting some more usage ;). regards, Martin -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF

VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-13 Thread Jakob Korherr
Hi everbody. While working on MYFACES-2375, I got stuck at the following scenario: Managed bean m1 has a custom scope #{m2.scope} and managed bean m2 has a custom scope #{m1.scope}. In this scenario you will get a StackOverflowException when trying to create one of the two managed beans. RI

Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-13 Thread Michael Concini
What about using project stage to determine which behavior to follow? If we're in production stage we don't check for best performance, but in development/test stages we perform the check. Alternatively, could we at least make it configurable through an org.apache.myfaces param in web.xml so

Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-13 Thread Simon Lessard
+1 for the project stage idea. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.comwrote: What about using project stage to determine which behavior to follow? If we're in production stage we don't check for best performance, but in development/test stages we perform the

Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-13 Thread Bruno Aranda
+1 with the project stage sounds good to me! 2009/10/13 Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com +1 for the project stage idea. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.comwrote: What about using project stage to determine which behavior to follow? If we're in

Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-13 Thread Kito Mann
+1 On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.comwrote: +1 with the project stage sounds good to me! 2009/10/13 Simon Lessard simon.lessar...@gmail.com +1 for the project stage idea. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.comwrote: What

Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-13 Thread Werner Punz
+1 as well for the project stage idea, the dev stage is definitely the one which should track this but for production we need optimal performance. Werner Kito Mann schrieb: +1 On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Aranda brunoara...@gmail.com mailto:brunoara...@gmail.com wrote: +1

Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-13 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 for the project stage idea regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2009/10/13 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com +1 as well for the project stage idea, the dev stage

Re: VOTE: jsf 2.0: should cyclic references in managed-bean custom scopes be detected?

2009-10-13 Thread Jan-Kees van Andel
+1, but it might be a lot of work. Maybe we should first get a spec-compliant release out and plan this one for a second release. /JK 2009/10/13 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: +1 for the project stage idea regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF