It appears that almost all of us are accustomed with MyFaces written with
the capital M. So I will change accordingly the logotype.
I think that will be good if we can use this naming style for all MyFaces
projects.
Something like:
Tobago, Tomahawk, Trinidad, Orchestra, and so on.
If we find
Yes, clear - one for all.
regards,
Martin
On 12/10/07, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that almost all of us are accustomed with MyFaces written with
the capital M. So I will change accordingly the logotype.
I think that will be good if we can use this naming style for
, December 08, 2007 10:33 AM
To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Hello
I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces
capital M version. I know that many of us
. Barbalace
Boston, MA, USA
-Original Message-
*From:* Adonis Raduca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Saturday, December 08, 2007 10:33 AM
*To:* dev@myfaces.apache.org
*Subject:* myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?
Hello
I look on all comments and I seen the majority
Adonis,
I agree. It's looking like people like logo 5 on your last set of
logos. Can we get a hi-res and lowres version of that logo with all the
caps. And once again, thanks for doing all of this. They look great.
I also noticed on the PDF's you sent up that you had watermarked the
I meant for the bridge logos.. :) Sorry!
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Adonis,
I agree. It's looking like people like logo 5 on your last set of
logos. Can we get a hi-res and lowres version of that logo with all
the caps. And once again, thanks for doing all of this. They look
great.
I
I'd always call it:
Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
Apache MyFaces Tobago
Apache MyFaces Trinidad
Apache MyFaces Blah
...
On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for all
myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I
+1 for M :).
On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd always call it:
Apache MyFaces Tomahawk
Apache MyFaces Tobago
Apache MyFaces Trinidad
Apache MyFaces Blah
...
On Dec 9, 2007 3:25 AM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that is
I also prefer M, as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed with
Mathias for the naming convention Apache MyFaces, etc instead of Apache
myFaces, etc.
regards,
Catalin
On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for M :).
On Dec 9, 2007 1:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
I would also go for the M since it is a name and not an instance variable :)
On Dec 10, 2007 12:59 AM, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also prefer M, as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed with
Mathias for the naming convention Apache MyFaces, etc instead of Apache
myFaces,
Capital M, always.
On 12/9/07, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also prefer M, as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed with
Mathias for the naming convention Apache MyFaces, etc instead of Apache
myFaces, etc.
regards,
Catalin
On Dec 9, 2007 2:18 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL
M
On Dec 9, 2007 7:46 PM, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Capital M, always.
On 12/9/07, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also prefer M, as i always known MyFaces like that, and agreed with
Mathias for the naming convention Apache MyFaces, etc instead of Apache
I prefer the M
On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces
capital M version. I know that many of us are familiar with MyFaces
version and I either. I propose the myFaces, small m from the
I prefer the lower case m,
Cheers,
Bruno
On 08/12/2007, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer the M
On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces
capital M version. I
I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it wrong..
On Dec 8, 2007 8:05 PM, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer the M
On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree
On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it wrong..
snip/
Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially
in the logo :-)
-Rahul
I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the
project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
instance, most of the time we write in this list Oracle instead of
ORACLE (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more
appealing to us, so just vote and
M :)
On Dec 8, 2007 9:47 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the
project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For
instance, most of the time we write in this list Oracle instead of
ORACLE (logo). I guess we
Eh, I think that is total different beast.
We all work here as individuals and it is ok to misspell names...
But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes, confusing.
-M
On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not so sure if it is the same writing the
I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for all
myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar with the
Java naming convention for the instance variables.
Something like:
myFaces
tobago
tomahawk
…
I think that once the naming strategy will be in place
20 matches
Mail list logo
