Hi Vipul,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 03:48:51PM -0800, Vipul Rahane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems fine to me to remove the range feature. I am little bit concerned
> about version.yml specially for backwards compatibility but if that's not
> an issue it's all good.
Repos should keep their `version.yml`
Hi,
Seems fine to me to remove the range feature. I am little bit concerned
about version.yml specially for backwards compatibility but if that's not
an issue it's all good.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:02 AM Will wrote:
> Chris:
>
> I read the entire email as well and it all sounds good to me.
Chris:
I read the entire email as well and it all sounds good to me.
Will
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:04 AM Christopher Collins
wrote:
> Hi Szymon,
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Szymon Janc wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Yes! Let's simplify this as much as possible.
> > Do I get
Hi,
Great! And yes, I've read the whole email:-)
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 16:04, Christopher Collins
wrote:
> Hi Szymon,
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Szymon Janc wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > Yes! Let's simplify this as much as possible.
> > Do I get this correctly that change we
Hi Szymon,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Szymon Janc wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Yes! Let's simplify this as much as possible.
> Do I get this correctly that change we could (if want to) get rid of
> release branches and just freeze master during release?
Thanks for reading. Yes, that
Hello all,
This is a follow up to an email I sent last week (subject: "Proposal:
Remove version.yml files). In that email my thoughts were somewhat...
illegible. I'm going to try again, hopefully with a bit more clarity.
This email concerns Mynewt's repo dependency system. That is to say,
