Re: HAL cputime and low power RTC

+1 for efficiency. All the best Wayne On 23 June 2016 at 23:42, Vipul Rahane wrote: > +1 for efficiency. > > Regards, > Vipul Rahane > > > On Jun 23, 2016, at 2:35 PM, chris collins wrote: > > > > I would also favor efficiency over genericness in this case

Re: HAL cputime and low power RTC

+1 for efficiency. Regards, Vipul Rahane > On Jun 23, 2016, at 2:35 PM, chris collins wrote: > > I would also favor efficiency over genericness in this case since > cputime is fundamental to time-critical tasks. It will mean more > configuration for the application

Re: HAL cputime and low power RTC

I would also favor efficiency over genericness in this case since cputime is fundamental to time-critical tasks. It will mean more configuration for the application developer, but I don't see a way around that. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:33 PM, will sanfilippo wrote: > Hello: >

HAL cputime and low power RTC

Hello: I wanted to post a question to the dev list to see if folks had opinions regarding the following topic. As others have stated “this will be a long and dry email” so be forewarned… HAL cputime was developed to provide application developers access to a generic, high resolution timer.