In the 16-bit case I don't understand why you would ever reset the index to 0.
So long as the value is increasing, you will always have 32k entries prior to
wrap. I don't see why you'd care that it starts at a given number.
Sterling
> On Sep 1, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Ray Suorsa (JIRA)
Hello Peter,
Sorry, I did am not copied on the ticket and so I did not receive a
notification.
The main reason behind adding an index was indicating the order of entries
logged in a millisecond. If the timestamp is the same which could be the case
if we log at a lower level than the
