Re: [VOTE] Release Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

2016-02-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > These are actually generated using sha512: > > gpg2 --print-md SHA512 larva-0.8.0-b1.tgz > larva-0.8.0-b1.tgz.sha Ah it's sha512. Looks like openssl is a bit more friendly: openssl dgst -sha512 larva-0.8.0-b1.tgz SHA512(larva-0.8.0-b1.tgz)=

Re: [3/3] incubator-mynewt-larva git commit: Add license to .gitignore file.

2016-02-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I'll second that: Justin, and I say this knowing you're Australian: you've > earned as many beers as you can drink when we meet :-) I certainly drink beer. However I’ll pass on Fosters and Budwizer - they are not release quality IMO :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

2016-02-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) from me. To be clear that doesn’t stop other people voting +1, and if you get 3+1 you can still put it up on the IPMC general list for a vote. You’re also welcome to try and change my mind, anyone can change their vote after initial voting. All the -1 means is

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

2016-02-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Part of the requirement for voting on a source artefact is that you can compile the package. With the current source releases how is that actually done? Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

2016-02-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, See we already have an enthusiastic +1 vote. It is customary to list what was actually checked in the release and on what platform it was tested on. Being the first release I do suggest we double check everything just in case something has slipped through the cracks, other wise the vote

Fwd: hal organization and multiple smaller packages

2016-02-22 Thread will sanfilippo
Sorry all; thought this was addressed to dev > Begin forwarded message: > > From: will sanfilippo > Subject: Re: hal organization and multiple smaller packages > Date: February 22, 2016 at 3:42:15 PM PST > To: sterl...@apache.org > > See comments > >> On Feb 22, 2016, at

Re: [3/3] incubator-mynewt-larva git commit: Add license to .gitignore file.

2016-02-22 Thread Christopher Collins
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:39:41AM +1100, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Whoops, thanks Justin. I didn't see that note in time. > > Pulling license header of files that may not require it is a non issue, I > very much doubt that anyone would take issue with it or in fact even notice > :-)

[VOTE] Release Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

2016-02-22 Thread Christopher Collins
Hello all, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of mynewt-0.8.0-b1-incubating. Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open source initiative for constrained, embedded applications. The release candidate to be voted on is available at:

Re: hal organization and multiple smaller packages

2016-02-22 Thread Sterling Hughes
On 2/22/16 1:24 PM, will sanfilippo wrote: My 1/2 cent on this topic (and I certainly dont think you killed the discussion; it is a difficult topic): * I think the HAL is meant to be a fairly general, simple, abstraction. Hopefully over time we will be able to incorporate more advanced HAL

Re: [3/3] incubator-mynewt-larva git commit: Add license to .gitignore file.

2016-02-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Again no harm done but no required. JFYI - Files without any creative content don’t need a license header, .gitignore would fall under that. [1] Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions

Re: Planning to add log facilities

2016-02-22 Thread Sterling Hughes
Welcome Gordon! That would be awesome. Sterling On 2/22/16 3:37 AM, Gordon Chaffee wrote: Hi, I'm new to the list, and I'm working on some code to extend the existing logs capabilities. Specifically, I'm planning to add the following: newtmgr: - Create 'logs' command for dealing with logs -

Re: RAT (release audit tool)

2016-02-22 Thread Christopher Collins
Thanks, Justin, that is a good idea. I'll run both of those tools. Chris On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:54:17PM +1100, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It quite likely that anyone reviewing the release on the incubator will use: > 1) Apache rat [1] > 2) Compliance Rocks > > We might want to put a

Planning to add log facilities

2016-02-22 Thread Gordon Chaffee
Hi, I'm new to the list, and I'm working on some code to extend the existing logs capabilities. Specifically, I'm planning to add the following: newtmgr: - Create 'logs' command for dealing with logs - Add 'logs show' command for pulling logs from the target device - Add 'logs clear' to erase the