Re: Initial impressions.

2016-10-21 Thread marko kiiskila
This is now checked into develop branch. These are in mcu/mcu.h. > On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:35 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > PS: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYNEWT-424 > > On 6 Oct 2016, at 13:33, Sterling Hughes wrote: > >> Glen thanks for the feedback, much

Out of Office

2016-10-21 Thread alex
Hello I'm out of the office this week, so email responses will be slower than usual All the best Alex

Re: os_time_delay() changed?

2016-10-21 Thread Christopher Collins
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:20:00AM -0700, will sanfilippo wrote: > Yes, possibly. We never should have used 500 there. It should be in > terms of OS_TICKS_PER SEC. Some bsps now use 128 ticks per second > > So that is probably it. To add to Will's answer, if you are dealing with large time

Out of Office

2016-10-21 Thread alex
Hello I'm out of the office this week, so email responses will be slower than usual All the best Alex

Re: os_time_delay() changed?

2016-10-21 Thread will sanfilippo
Yes, possibly. We never should have used 500 there. It should be in terms of OS_TICKS_PER SEC. Some bsps now use 128 ticks per second So that is probably it. > On Oct 21, 2016, at 11:17 AM, David G. Simmons wrote: > > Has there been a change in os_time_delay()?

Out of Office

2016-10-21 Thread alex
Hello I'm out of the office this week, so email responses will be slower than usual All the best Alex

os_time_delay() changed?

2016-10-21 Thread David G. Simmons
Has there been a change in os_time_delay()? os_time_delay(500) used to be a half-second delay. Now it is a 5-second delay. dg -- David G. Simmons (919) 534-5099 Web • Blog • Linkedin • Twitter