Re: WIP: sensor API

There are probably instances where 1kHz isn't fast enough for certain sensor types: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mynewt-core/compare/develop...sensors_branch#diff-ec052d973c26072d9ac2e198f16e764aR226 /** * Poll rate in MS for this sensor. */ uint32_t s_poll_rate;

Re: WIP: sensor API

Hi Sterling, One other important question is what happens when we don't respect the read request intervals between data samples? In the accel sim (really nice to see sim examples, BTW ... that's extremely useful to test sensor algorithms), you just check the number of missing samples from

WIP: sensor API

Hi, I’ve added initial support for a sensors API to mynewt in a branch off develop called “sensors_branch.” You can find a full diff here, or pull the source code directly: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mynewt-core/compare/develop...sensors_branch I’ll caveat that this API needs

Re: System init and OS eventq ensure

> On Dec 11, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > Hi, > >> >>> On Dec 11, 2016, at 10:55 AM, Christopher Collins >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:11:44AM -0800, will sanfilippo wrote: Personally, I keep wanting to try and

Re: final release step (was: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt ...)

Hi Greg, On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 08:45:17PM -0600, Greg Stein wrote: > Hi all, > > I was looking at prior releases, and noticed that the final step to publish > the release appears to have been done wrong. No harm done, but suboptimal. > > It appears the release artifacts were *added* into >

Re: GDB + SIM broken with macOS sierra

I also tried to use lldb for a few days, and decided that gdb setup is still worth the trouble. > On Dec 10, 2016, at 10:12 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > Ugh. > > I’ve been using lldb for most of the day, and it’s… fine. Certainly it has > improved over the years. We