Re: building newt using go

Thanks! That is quite helpful. On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Simon Ratner wrote: > Hey Bill, > > I ran into that recently, grab a newer version of go. > This constant was added in 1.7: https://golang.org/doc/go1.7#io > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Bill Rees

Re: MyNewt: NimBLE: Question regarding large file transfer over Bluetooth

Hi Pritish, On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:15:49PM -0800, Pritish Gandhi wrote: > Hi All, > Disclaimer: I don't know much about Bluetooth so I might sound like a novice > > I've been thinking about writing an application to transfer an OTA image > over Bluetooth and am wondering what would be the

Re: building newt using go

Note to devs: docs still say "The Newt tool requires Go version 1.5 or later." http://mynewt.apache.org/latest/newt/install/newt_linux/ On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Simon Ratner wrote: > Hey Bill, > > I ran into that recently, grab a newer version of go. > This constant was

Re: building newt using go

Hey Bill, I ran into that recently, grab a newer version of go. This constant was added in 1.7: https://golang.org/doc/go1.7#io On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Bill Rees wrote: > I'm in a virtual box environment with Ubuntu yakkety and have installed go > 1.6. When I build

building newt using go

I'm in a virtual box environment with Ubuntu yakkety and have installed go 1.6. When I build newt ala "go install" I see an error: "undefined io.SeekCurrent" for which I can find no value. Is this a sign of a bad install? A missing module? Thanks, Bill Rees --

MyNewt: NimBLE: Question regarding large file transfer over Bluetooth

Hi All, Disclaimer: I don't know much about Bluetooth so I might sound like a novice I've been thinking about writing an application to transfer an OTA image over Bluetooth and am wondering what would be the best way to go about it. I was looking at the generic Object Transfer Services in the

Re: Newtmgr over BLE

Hi Jacob, Chris has been working on getting the Mynewt stack working in a cross platform way. You can see some of his progress here: * https://github.com/ccollins476ad/incubator-mynewt-core/tree/nativehost/apps/blehostd/src *

Re: Newtmgr over BLE

Whats the internal thinking on this? Is it being discussed elsewhere? Is the aforementioned rewrite going on, or delayed so it make sense for me to try to get work on the xpc calls? On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Jacob Rosenthal wrote: > The gatt dependency actually

Re: Mynewt - merging develop to master

Hi all, I’ve now created branches where we can get 1.0.0 ready (1_0_0_dev). This exists for all the repos. I’ll start doing license checks etc on these branches now. There might or might not be further bug fixes going in. I can see there are still tickets open for this release, we’ll need to

Re: Unhandled interrupt (3) occurred when porting mynewt to other board

Hi Louie, thanks for the pointer to code. I can see that the startup code is probably what you should look at. Contrast and compare those against the file stm32f4discovery uses. Here are few things I noticed: interrupt vector holds ‘__StackTop’ as the pointer to initial stack. I notice in

Re: way too many commits

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1d9420a8cf10db60bcee931d306d99806d59f518d87172b863603ba3@%3Cdev.mynewt.apache.org%3E > On Mar 7, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Padmasheela kiiskila wrote: > > An email was sent on Sunday evening to Dev list by Marko Kiiskila indicating > that this

Re: way too many commits

An email was sent on Sunday evening to Dev list by Marko Kiiskila indicating that this would happen (merging Develop into Master and branch out 1.0 from b2 tag in anticipation of a major release). -Sheela On Mar 7, 2017, at 2:59 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017

[RFC] Shell improvements

Hi, for the last few weeks, I've been working on improving the shell functionality. I prepared a separate app so that it's easy to work on it separately and play around with it. Here are some features of the new shell: 1. First of all, the new shell improves the concept of modules. Modules

Re: way too many commits

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:25 AM, aditi hilbert wrote: > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at 11:22 AM, David Brown wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:38:47AM -0600, Greg Stein wrote: > > > >> I just saw about two hundred commits suddenly land in the Git

Re: way too many commits

> On Mar 7, 2017, at 11:22 AM, David Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:38:47AM -0600, Greg Stein wrote: > >> I just saw about two hundred commits suddenly land in the Git repository >> today. This seems problematic from a *community* standpoint because how >>

Re: way too many commits

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:38:47AM -0600, Greg Stein wrote: I just saw about two hundred commits suddenly land in the Git repository today. This seems problematic from a *community* standpoint because how could anybody else review ALL of those commits? And what if commit #10 was going in the

way too many commits

Hey all, I just saw about two hundred commits suddenly land in the Git repository today. This seems problematic from a *community* standpoint because how could anybody else review ALL of those commits? And what if commit #10 was going in the wrong direction ... well, the following 190 went down