Hi *,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:33:34PM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
> Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:39:37PM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
> >>Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> [...]
> >This is true for defects, but not for RFEs (at least not in practice).
>
> It should be. I
Hi *,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:13:24AM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
> Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:54:31PM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
> >>Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> [OOoPleaseHelp-Issues]
> >That is exactly the idea behind closing it. Get it out of the way, leave
>
Joerg wrote:
> > When you cannot change a small (implementation wise) point of a spec
> > with clear arguments, how could you influence spec only by request,
> > user-feedback, votes alone?
> Try changing/influencing it *before* feature/UI freeze!
Have the linguistic errors in the French version
Hi Christian,
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:39:37PM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
This kind of information is useless since almost all RFEs have the TM
"OOo later" or "---" which can be excachanged by each other without any
loss of information.
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 03:54:31PM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
issues that won't be dealt with by Sun because of workload, bad
effort/gain ratio, of no interest because StarOffice has commercial
replacement, ... ("We won't implement it,
