Le Sun, 31 May 2009 16:41:55 -0400, Louis Suarez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > On 2009-05-30, at 04:18 , Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > > > > > I may have misunderstood but it should also be noted that AFAICT > > RG groups wiki should also belong to the NLC category, or am I > > being mistaken? > > I think mistaken, as a lot of the regions will occupy more than one > linguistic territory and to depend the RGs to the NLCs will end up > confusing matters. I'd rather then initiate a new sector, "Regional > Groups" which may be freely linked to or even on occasion duplicate > the NLC extant efforts. I've grown less fearful of > duplication--humans like inventing and then reinventing the wheel and > that's the way it is--but do want to limit confusion. > > Let's say I'm looking for an RG based in Delhi. The region is fairly > local--a small city, Delhi boasts only >12M, a lentil compared to > Mexico City's bean :-) --and nearly as many languages as there are > gods: lots. I could find this RG easily enough by looking for Delhi > under "India" but may not so easily if I look, say, under Hindi, etc. > > But I'm not too deaf to reason. If you or anyone else, like Cornell, > come up with a better ontology, I'm all ears. My forte is not > informatics ontology, but it is, I am sure, someone else's. Well, what I'm only requesting is to tag the RG wiki pages as NLC; but tagging them as regional groups beside it is obvious to me; this is a wiki, after all... Cheers, Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@native-lang.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@native-lang.openoffice.org
