Hi Antonio,
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2021, 23:24 +0200 schrieb antonio:
> In which module is System.loadLibrary being invoked? Does that module
> depend on any other module that exports the class
The JPMS module is the UNNAMED module (we load OpenJFX on the
classpath), for NetBeans modules the mo
Here's the Beta 2:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release124/4/
Before we sign everything and start a voting thread, please check the
convenience binary in the above to verify that it now solves the problem?
Gj
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:04 PM Martin Ba
D'oh,
If they're calling that from a native thread then they're probably
missing a call to "jvm->AttachCurrentThread(...)" /
"jvm->DetachCurrentTrhead(...)" somewhere too.
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/invocation.html
"Attaching to the VM
The JNI interface
Hi Matthias,
In which module is System.loadLibrary being invoked? Does that module
depend on any other module that exports the class
"com/sun/webkit/FileSystem"? Is that class exposed in a public API?
I think that's the way forward.
Cheers,
Antonio
El 6/4/21 a las 22:36, Matthias Bläsing es
Hi all,
It seems the CND cluster is using a library called Clank
(cnd/libs.clank). This seems to be a Java wrapper around clang, which
was presented at "2017 European LLVM Developers Meeting" [1]
Quoting:
"The Java port of native Clang. The goal was to get the Java code as
close to the orig
Hi NetBeans modules system experts,
I'm trying to fix OpenJFX in NetBeans without changing the native code
of OpenJFX. I observed, that OpenJFX on NetBeans fails with a segfault
when a "normal" Webpage (https://netbeans.apache.org) is loaded. I
could it track down to this code:
https://github.com
I’ve seen Neil prepared PR release124 with Svata commit.
I think that’s all for the moment for Beta2
Thanks’
Martin
On 6 Apr 2021, at 17:34, Geertjan Wielenga
mailto:geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.INVALID>>
wrote:
I've merged it, but now it's in master. I believe it needs to be in
release124
Will be prepared, master -> release124
Martin
On 6 Apr 2021, at 17:34, Geertjan Wielenga
mailto:geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.INVALID>>
wrote:
I've merged it, but now it's in master. I believe it needs to be in
release124 branch, too. Can you do that?
Gj
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:30 PM Mart
I think we should add nothing beyond the one specific pr for which we're
doing the second beta.
Gj
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:44 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 16:37, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, how to get the pull request I merged into master to be in
> release124?
>
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 16:37, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>
> Yes, how to get the pull request I merged into master to be in release124?
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2866
Needs a PR with base as release124 from master. Same as we did during
12.3 (and will do for 12.4 after freeze) from d
Yes, how to get the pull request I merged into master to be in release124?
Gj
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:35 PM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 16:12, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > In light of events today, and especially this:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2864
>
>
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 16:12, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> In light of events today, and especially this:
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2864
Events today? Just that?
> I propose we (i.e., Neil and I) put together Beta 2 (which we had not
> planned for but again to support VSNetBeans)
I've merged it, but now it's in master. I believe it needs to be in
release124 branch, too. Can you do that?
Gj
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:30 PM Martin Balin wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks’ for considering Beta rebuild for this. I support Beta 2.
> It will definitely make live of NetBeans in VSCode easier
Hi,
Thanks’ for considering Beta rebuild for this. I support Beta 2.
It will definitely make live of NetBeans in VSCode easier.
Martin
On 6 Apr 2021, at 17:12, Geertjan Wielenga
mailto:geert...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
In light of events today, and especially this:
https://urldefense.com/v3
Hi all,
In light of events today, and especially this:
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2864
I propose we (i.e., Neil and I) put together Beta 2 (which we had not
planned for but again to support VSNetBeans) and that we use that for
voting purposes.
How does this sound -- or is that not
Hi,
I’ve found the issue with Gradle experimental new option in 12.4 Beta1, right
after I’ve sent +1 vote there ;-)
As Laszlo wrote in his announcement for new feature "Gradle Project Loading
Changes, Call for Test/Review” on Mar 29th
“...my aim is to deliver the code with the feature switched o
Hi all,
We'll need to modify the current mechanism for updating the NetBeans
website. Deadline is June the 1st.
Maybe it's a good time to revamp/redesign the site and/or even review
the current publishing mechanism. IIRC we had some fancy desktop designs
(no mobile) without any SCSS counterp
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021, 08:15 antonio, wrote:
> c) Otherwise we committers can squash using the command line with the
> detailed instructions that Matthias suggested on 2019-12-12 ([1]).
>
> Am I understading this correctly?
>
Ideally not from step 14. Instead, git push -f to the pull request, then
Hi,
So, if I understand correctly:
a) It's ok to use the squash-and-merge button if contributors have
proper github/email addresses in their github profile (is this so? or do
we want to disable it completely?).
b) Otherwise we prefer that contributors squash themselves (git rebase
-i) and u
19 matches
Mail list logo
