Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

+1 (binding) - Checked JARs - Verified signatures, NOTICE, and LICENSE - Built: OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu11.39+15-CA (build 11.0.7+10-LTS) OS X: 11.2 - Ran without issues Josh Juneau juneau...@gmail.com http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=juneau

Re: 12.4 Can we fix cut and paste before release?

As stated there: “ Please run with logging enabled (-J-Dorg.netbeans.core.NbClipboard=-1) and attach the part of log that records what happened during the broken situation.” Thanks, Gj On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 22:12, Scott Palmer wrote: > The discussion on this old bug seems to be most relevant

Re: 12.4 Can we fix cut and paste before release?

The discussion on this old bug seems to be most relevant: https://bz.apache.org/netbeans//show_bug.cgi?id=41098 Over 16 years ago this was apparently a JDK issue. (People were using JDK 1.4 at the time.) See Comment 21 I suspect the

Re: 12.4 Can we fix cut and paste before release?

Hi, I am having the similar problem with copy and paste. This mostly happens when I have two NetBeans instances opened. Say 12.2 and 12.3. I am using both Oracle Java 8 64bit and OpenJDK 11 64bit. And how do I resolve this issue? I open an empty notepad. Copy text from NetBeans to Notepad. And the

Re: 12.4 Can we fix cut and paste before release?

Both directions to/from a NetBeans editor to/from something outside. Not consistent, but frequent enough - multiple times a week. It seems when this occurs it is like the NetBeans editor has a private clipboard. Pasting outside NetBEans pastes the last thing copied outside of NetBeans. Pasti

Re: 12.4 Can we fix cut and paste before release?

It’s 100% about copying text from any NetBeans editor to somewhere outside NetBeans? Or also the reverse? Consistently or sporadically? Gj On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 21:57, Scott Palmer wrote: > Windows 10 > JDK 8 through 16 > > See prior discussion here: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox

Re: 12.4 Can we fix cut and paste before release?

Windows 10 JDK 8 through 16 See prior discussion here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans-dev/202102.mbox/%3c21fb7d82-e02c-4a4f-8bd7-605615cc5...@gmail.com%3e It seems many of us are just used to Copy and Paste not working properly and we have various strategies to work around it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans Standalone Java Hints Tool 12.3 [vote candidate 2]

+1 (binding) - signature and SHA512 checked - verified repository content and source zip match - build from source (on JDK-8 ok, failed on JDK-11) - basic test of jackpot succeeded - eyeballed LICENSE and NOTICE files for binary and source - Building on JDK 11 fails: -do-compile: [mkdir] Cr

Re: JavaHelp in browser (was: UML, Donations, and JavaHelp Oh-My)

Hello, I just wanted to say I was very interested in contributing to this project and would like to echo my professors questions on what could be done further. Best regards, Aleksandra Mišić On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 20:45, Zoran Sevarac wrote: > Hi Jens and thanks for the great work. > I have a

Re: JavaHelp in browser (was: UML, Donations, and JavaHelp Oh-My)

Hi Jens and thanks for the great work. I have a student at University of Belgrade, Aleksandra Misic aleksandra.1mi...@gmail.com, who is doing an open source project and is interested to contribute to this project. I will also help her. So what what would be the best way to contribute and push deve

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

+1 Kai On 4/8/2021 12:43 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Dear community, Here's Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2, a new vote thread, because in the previous one we pointed to the convenience binary and SHA for the convenience binary instead of the source and its SHA as the voting artifact. We've crea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

+1 (binding) Checked the checksum, signature built with jdk 11 On 4/8/21 3:43 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Dear community, Here's Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2, a new vote thread, because in the previous one we pointed to the convenience binary and SHA for the convenience binary instead of the s

Re: Manipulating System Classpath with NetBeans (OpenJFX assumes classes can be loaded by FindClass)

Hi, JNI_OnLoad has a companion JNI_OnUnload [1], which is the perfect place to invoke an env->DeleteGlobalRef(MyWhateverClass), allowing the JVM garbage collector to do a proper cleanup. Kind regards, Antonio [1] https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/jni/spec/invocation.htm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

+1 - verified sha512 and asc signatures for sources and convenience binaries - verified LICENSE and NOTICE - sources don't contain any other .jar files than mentioned plus jar files in mavenmock directory - built on Ubuntu 20.10 with JDK 1.8.0_275 Tested both built NetBeans and convenience bi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

+1 (binding) Checked the checksum, signature built with jdk 11 On 4/7/21 5:38 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Dear community, Here's Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2. We've created a new beta to fix one issue we had in Beta 1: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2864 Please read the below and vo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

That's a relief, thanks. :-) Gj On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 4:21 PM Tomáš Procházka wrote: > Sorry, I accidentally used old KEYS file. > Now I can confirm that signature is OK. > I'll do the other checks. > > Tom > > On 08. 04. 21 14:41, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > This is the ASC for the source: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

Hi, +1 (binding) * SHA512 ok * GPG signature verified (geert...@apache.org) * source contains LICENSE and NOTICE * source builds into a binary with LICENSE + NOTICE (+3rd party) - JDK8 used. Happy testing, -Svata Dne 08. 04. 21 v 12:43 Geertjan Wielenga napsal(a): Dear community, Here's A

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

Sorry, I accidentally used old KEYS file. Now I can confirm that signature is OK. I'll do the other checks. Tom On 08. 04. 21 14:41, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: This is the ASC for the source: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/netbeans-12.4-beta2-source.zip.asc

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

+1 (binding) Eric -Message d'origine- De : Geertjan Wielenga Envoyé : jeudi 8 avril 2021 12:44 À : dev Objet : [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2 Dear community, Here's Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2, a new vote thread, because in the previous one we pointed to the convenience b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

Agreed, but bit late for that — it’s already on the mailing list, with the same subject as this one. Gj On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 15:52, Eric Barboni wrote: > Up sir :D > > But we need a new thread I guess with attempt 2 added to avoid mess. > > Regards > Eric > > -Message d'origine- > De :

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

Up sir :D But we need a new thread I guess with attempt 2 added to avoid mess. Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Neil C Smith Envoyé : jeudi 8 avril 2021 12:44 À : dev Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2 On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 11:39, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

This is the ASC for the source: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/netbeans-12.4-beta2-source.zip.asc Gj On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:24 PM Tomáš Procházka wrote: > I downloaded ASC from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/netbeans

Re: Manipulating System Classpath with NetBeans (OpenJFX assumes classes can be loaded by FindClass)

Hi Matthias, Thanks, I missed this message, but the good thing is that by looking into it already, I could understand your PR more easily :) This seems a trivial fix, but of course it needs more review and testing. I don't see major issues with this one, so I hope we can integrate that in a few

Re: AW: How to Implement a New Language

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:19 AM Eric Bresie wrote: > S...if one was to want to implement new Python or other new languages, > it would be possible to implement and leverage one of the implemented > servers like those defined here? > > https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/implem

Re: [External] : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

When I voted earlier today I realized the link labeled in Geertjan email as "We are primarily voting on:” is to binary. So I went to another link https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/ in email, downloaded sources, checked SHA which is there as well…. jar files…. In

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

I downloaded ASC from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/netbeans-12.4-beta2-bin.zip.asc When trying to verify signature I got "Can't check signature".$ gpg --verify netbeans-12.4-beta2-source.zip.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'netbeans-12.4-beta2-source.zip

Re: AW: How to Implement a New Language

S...if one was to want to implement new Python or other new languages, it would be possible to implement and leverage one of the implemented servers like those defined here? https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/implementors/servers/ Eric On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 8:05 AM Christi

Re: Manipulating System Classpath with NetBeans (OpenJFX assumes classes can be loaded by FindClass)

Hi Johan, thanks for chiming in. I requested an issue yesterday evening, but is was not yet made public. Maybe you could see if you can open up 9069811. It is full version of the report and can be considered a duplicate of JDK-8264886. It contains the crash info and instructions to reproduce thoug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 11:39, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > If we start a new voting thread for 12.4 Beta 2, are there people who will > actually join in and vote in that thread? Well we only need one other PMC than us! Vote on beta is mainly to check it's OK to release from an ASF point of view, so

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

OK, done. This thread is closed. Gj On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:41 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 11:37, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > > Here's the SHA: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/netbeans-12.4-beta2-bin.zip.sha512 > > > > Ind

[VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

Dear community, Here's Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2, a new vote thread, because in the previous one we pointed to the convenience binary and SHA for the convenience binary instead of the source and its SHA as the voting artifact. We've created a new beta to fix one issue we had in Beta 1: https://

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 11:37, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Here's the SHA: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/netbeans-12.4-beta2-bin.zip.sha512 > > Indeed, I put the SHA and voting artifact to the convenience binary rather > than the source. > > Should I start

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

I must say, though, that I've been surprised that people have been extremely slow to respond to the Beta voting threads, despite apparently the Beta being needed for VSNetBeans. If we start a new voting thread for 12.4 Beta 2, are there people who will actually join in and vote in that thread? Gj

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

Here's the SHA: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/netbeans-12.4-beta2-bin.zip.sha512 Indeed, I put the SHA and voting artifact to the convenience binary rather than the source. Should I start a new vote thread for that reason? Sure, no problem if so. Gj On Thu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 19:27, Tomáš Procházka wrote: > I think that primary vote is on source code and not covenience binary. > > Link to sources should be: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/netbeans/netbeans/12.4-beta2/netbeans-12.4-beta2-source.zip And the SHA is incorrect too. Sorry, Ge

Re: Manipulating System Classpath with NetBeans (OpenJFX assumes classes can be loaded by FindClass)

On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 09:50, antonio wrote: > On 07/04/2021 8:21, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > > Stack: [0x7fa41ce47000,0x7fa41d646000], sp=0x7fa41d6449c0, > > free space=8182k > > Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, A=aot compiled Java code, > > j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native

Re: Manipulating System Classpath with NetBeans (OpenJFX assumes classes can be loaded by FindClass)

Hi, I have some comments inline On 2021/04/08 03:28:10, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > Thanks a lot guys for investigating JavaFX integration into NetBeans! I still > love to use HTML/Java whenever possible and having a working WebView > integration is essential for that... > > > Some comments bel

Re: [External] : [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2

+1 Looks good Martin On 7 Apr 2021, at 14:38, Geertjan Wielenga mailto:geert...@apache.org>> wrote: Dear community, Here's Apache NetBeans 12.4 Beta 2. We've created a new beta to fix one issue we had in Beta 1: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2864__;!!GqivP