On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 01:51, Ernie Rael wrote:
> I think "NeedsTriage" has a meaning beyond that someone has made a comment.
> How about "NeedsTriage" can only be taken away when either "Bug" or
> "FeatureRequest" or ??? is added.
"Bug" or "Feature Request" labels are added depending on which for
On 23/02/06 12:34 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 at 00:51, Michael Bien wrote:
yeah it seems like nobody is using the triage label the way it was
originally intended.
We could probably just remove that label (or don't let gh set it by
default at the very least). If something is mis
On 06.02.23 21:34, Neil C Smith wrote:
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 at 00:51, Michael Bien wrote:
yeah it seems like nobody is using the triage label the way it was
originally intended.
We could probably just remove that label (or don't let gh set it by
default at the very least). If something is missin
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 at 00:51, Michael Bien wrote:
> yeah it seems like nobody is using the triage label the way it was
> originally intended.
>
> We could probably just remove that label (or don't let gh set it by
> default at the very least). If something is missing labels it is
> probably not tri
On 30.01.23 16:38, Neil C Smith wrote:
Hi all,
Doing my usual trawl through the issue space leading up to releases.
It's not quite as bad as the JIRA was .. yet! :-)
We've got about 13 pages of issues with needs:triage on them at the
moment. A lot of those have responses on them already. It's
Hi all,
Doing my usual trawl through the issue space leading up to releases.
It's not quite as bad as the JIRA was .. yet! :-)
We've got about 13 pages of issues with needs:triage on them at the
moment. A lot of those have responses on them already. It's possible
we should have used a different
