Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-08 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Great research! Gj On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 03:09, David Green wrote: > OK, feels like hacking but I found that this addition to the POM did the > trick: > > ``` > > org.apache.maven.plugins > maven-javadoc-plugin > 3.1.1 >

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-07 Thread David Green
OK, feels like hacking but I found that this addition to the POM did the trick: ``` org.apache.maven.plugins maven-javadoc-plugin 3.1.1 11 11

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-07 Thread David Green
I am in this camp (of wanting to generate javadoc formatted pages. I had been through these references (that you suggested — thanks though). I have now discovered that javadoc:javadoc works (either within NetBeans or at the command line with Maven) if the module-info.java file does NOT

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-07 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
And also for generating your own, that's a Maven task: https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/ Gj On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:11 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Maybe this: > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54278159/javafx-11-in-netbeans-10-with-maven-has-no-sources-javadocs

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-07 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Maybe this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54278159/javafx-11-in-netbeans-10-with-maven-has-no-sources-javadocs Gj On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:01 PM David Green wrote: > Thanks. > > Any on hints on generating Javadoc? > > Dave > > On 6 Oct 2019, at 8:59, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > > For

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-07 Thread David Green
Thanks. Any on hints on generating Javadoc? Dave On 6 Oct 2019, at 8:59, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: For debugging, this works: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56197372/i-cant-debug-an-application-using-netbeans-11-with-javafx-12 Gj On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 7:05 AM Geertjan Wielenga

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-06 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
For debugging, this works: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56197372/i-cant-debug-an-application-using-netbeans-11-with-javafx-12 Gj On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 7:05 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > However, take a look at Samples | OpenJFX in 11.1. > > Those two samples have the nbactions file

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-05 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
However, take a look at Samples | OpenJFX in 11.1. Those two samples have the nbactions file that contains the debug target too. Gj On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 6:58 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Yes, that is my aim too, it will happen, probably not for 11.2. > > Gj > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 6:53

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-05 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Yes, that is my aim too, it will happen, probably not for 11.2. Gj On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 6:53 AM David Green wrote: > Yes. > > That would be most useful. > > Long term, it would be nice to have this be set up when selecting a > project type. > > Thanks, > > Dave > > On 5 Oct 2019, at 23:35,

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-05 Thread David Green
Yes. That would be most useful. Long term, it would be nice to have this be set up when selecting a project type. Thanks, Dave On 5 Oct 2019, at 23:35, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: So, the project runs as described in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xaRwqcKPSI? You want another YouTube

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-05 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
And I completely agree with you -- the nbactions file should be included out of the box when the JavaFX Gluon archetypes are created. Gj On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 6:35 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > So, the project runs as described in: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xaRwqcKPSI? > > You want

Re: JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-05 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
So, the project runs as described in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xaRwqcKPSI? You want another YouTube clip just like that showing how to set up Debug and Javadoc goals in NetBeans? Gj On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 4:12 AM David Green wrote: > Using Netbeans 11.2.beta2 (although same issues

JavaFX needs some additional default support IMO

2019-10-05 Thread David Green
Using Netbeans 11.2.beta2 (although same issues seem to apply to 11.1 release), Using the example from https://openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/ for modules with Maven and NetBeans which is also highlighted in the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xaRwqcKPSI=youtu.be, this allows one to run code