, '3']);
var d=document, g=d.createElement('script'),
s=d.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
g.async=true; g.src=u+'matomo.js'; s.parentNode.insertBefore(g,s);
})();
Best Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : antonio <>
Envoyé : vendredi 3 juin 2022 07:30
À : dev@netbeans.apache.or
I did some more reading on the Matomo website (since I don't really know
this tracker).
https://matomo.org/faq/general/faq_2/
mentions that it has opt-out capability. This basically means "cookie
banner", IMO the internet has enough of those.
Also interesting: to make this banner render,
Hi,
+1 to using Matomo. I imagine this will be fast to do.
We may want to give the web a redesign, maybe including our build
system. Antora looks promising but somewhat complex (Antora is used in
some other Apache projects).
Also we may want to clean up legacy pages that are not used
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 13:27, Eric Barboni wrote:
> But we may have link to our page from external site that are hard to fix
> without tracker.
> I guess there are also other usage with heatmap on page and so one.
+1, for these reasons amongst others.
Neil
i 2022 19:00
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org; Eric Barboni
Objet : [MESSAGE MARQUE SPAM : BAS]Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Using Matomo Tracking
for our website
On 31.05.22 13:38, Eric Barboni wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This mail is to make more formal the proposal to setup the ASF
> Matomo i
On 31.05.22 13:38, Eric Barboni wrote:
Hi folks,
This mail is to make more formal the proposal to setup the ASF Matomo
instance for Apache NetBeans.
This webside analytics tool is compatible GPDR and his allowed by ASF. I
hope it may help us fixing 404 mostly.
aren't there easier ways to
