Yes. The plugin contains the Darcula LaF from JetBrains as an external
library, and some plumbing code that addresses the glitches and NetBeans
specific things when it is used in the IDE.
See it yourself:
https://github.com/Revivius/nb-darcula/tree/master/src/main/java/com/revivius/nb/darcula
Makes sense.
If I understand correctly, Hamit's Darcula NetBeans plugin is not a complete
Swing LAF by itself, but rather the NetBeans-related registrations and
extensions needed to adapt IntelliJ's "Darcula LAF" for the NetBeans IDE. This
kind of "adapter" code would be needed even if we were
Yes. Geertjan and me briefly talked with Hamit about that.
Hamit got quite busy recently, so I've done an extra step to prepare a
branch for him, so he only needs to fork that branch then create a PR to
the official NetBeans repo. So that PR would indicate his willingness of
donation.
We
Ah, I see. Has there been any talk yet about getting the Darcula plugin itself
donated into NetBeans?
-- Eirik
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Kishalmi
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 4:55 PM
To: dev@netbeans.apache.org
Subject: Re: Current state of Oracle donation of NetBeans to
The Darcula LaF has one file copied completely over (probably to
overcome the module friendship issues) from the NB dark LaF.
So it is more a licensing issue than a technical one.
On 11/22/19 1:42 PM, Eirik Bakke wrote:
What's the relationship between the Darcula NetBeans LAF plugin and the
It seems I've skimmed that part. Wasn't expecting it that early. Good
news! Thank you!
On 9/11/19 9:33 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
See the initial post here about the 4th donation re the dark look and feel.
Gj
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 05:13, Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
Hi Geertjan,
I know it
Ruby support shall be kept.
>
> > community-soa
> >
>
> Misguided junk to sell to managers who don't understand technology, so they
> can torture their employees with it.
>
That is so true! Send it to /dev/null, but: I am still obliged use SoapUI
on a regular base. This tool is so a nightmare
Hi Geertjan,
I know it is a minor point, but were you successful to schedule the dark
theme support ahead from the last donation?
Darcula is kind of depending on that one, though maybe one or two
classes form them.
On 9/11/19 1:02 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
Long-ish e-mail on
I do seem to recall a past thread on the UML part including some existing code
(1) and some other pull requests (2) around some of that.
Not sure if any of that would be helpful.
(1)
Wondering given the push towards the embedded module JDK would refactoring some
of this into more Embedded context be better?
Suppose some of that may also overlap some with C/C++ contribution.
Eric Bresie
ebre...@gmail.com
> On September 11, 2019 at 4:00:27 AM CDT, Tim Boudreau
> wrote:
> >
What about community-XML?
Seems still to be interesting..
-Sven
John Mc schrieb am Mi., 11. Sep. 2019, 17:35:
> Thank Geertjan,
>
> I didn't see the link in your email so missed the reference to JIRA...
> Apologies
>
> Going through the transition items, I spotted T06 - 'Migration of Wiki (or
Thank Geertjan,
I didn't see the link in your email so missed the reference to JIRA...
Apologies
Going through the transition items, I spotted T06 - 'Migration of Wiki (or
start from scratch?)' I was thinking, and looking at
http://wiki.netbeans.org/Main_Page, theres a lot there that we
Thanks Tim for the reminders on some of that stuff and the updates. A good
bit of it brings back some memories.
On the community-visualweb, I keep thinking we can somehow get such an
effort current/right.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:00 AM Tim Boudreau wrote:
> > nb.cluster.javacard
> >
>
> I'm
Yes, intended for the 5th donation, see my original mail in this thread,
many thanks for the pointer to these, we definitely want to bring across
the JIRA modules.
Gj
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:26 AM John Mc wrote:
> Can we also look to see whats happening with the JIRA modules?
>
> From
Thanks for the responses thus far, agree with them all.
And, in the case of UML, take a look at this:
https://blogs.oracle.com/geertjan/royal-netherlands-navy-on-netbeans
I agree that UML is worth keeping, though we need actual real people to be
working on it (as opposed to 'someone').
Gj
On
Hi Geertjan,
Nice to see progression in donation.
I cannot remember if community-uml was the tools we were using for teaching
purpose. But if it was the one in this screen [1] I may try to help if donated.
Best Regards
Eric
[1] https://netbeans.org/images_www/v6/5/screenshots/uml.png
> nb.cluster.javacard
>
I'm the primary (only?) author of Javacard support, and as far as I can
tell, Javacard is dead as a doornail. I see Oracle is still plugging away
at it - press release from January on the web site. But I can't say I've
heard of anyone using it in years. As a demo of how
17 matches
Mail list logo
