Re: Initial code cleanup

Sure, once we have a task we move it to JIRA. But for initial talks I personally prefer email. --emi On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Wade Chandler wrote: > This sounds like a good task for the wiki or Jira where we can break > things down into tables or tasks. Maybe use Jira for those; it all

Re: Initial code cleanup

> or, my pick, just replace java help with online links then move the help files to the wiki or some help site section. Getting rid of javahelp would break a stable API for plugin developers and Platform apps so we must also provide a migration path here. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Emilian

Re: Initial code cleanup

This sounds like a good task for the wiki or Jira where we can break things down into tables or tasks. Maybe use Jira for those; it allows us to comment on them and assign etc. Wade === Wade Chandler e: cons...@wadechandler.com > On Nov 2, 2016, at 15:49, Emilian Bold wrot

Re: Initial code cleanup

Could a mentor confirm that GPL with Classpath Exception has the same treatment as GPL and LGPL? My impression is that GPL w/ CPE is also a category X license. javahelp seems to be under GNU GPL 2 with CPE and we do use it: http://hg.netbeans.org/releases/file/5fd841261bf9/ javahelp/external/jhall

Initial code cleanup

Hello, As part of the IP Clearance we must do an initial code clean up . This includes looking for any potential licensing issues, such as using code with one of the licenses that may not be included with Apache products

Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

report [1] looks good to me. Feel free to add more bullets to the important issues list. The first bullet has to do with IP clearance. Maybe we should add to the list that we are working on that and still have open questions about/working on the code grant? We also already got a JIRA https://