That's perfect - Its sort of inline with what I was thinking and had
locally but just the 'nosignature' part and the different hash's was
confusing me.
Thanks for the explaination!
John
On 11 October 2017 at 06:35, Antonio wrote:
>
>
> On 11/10/17 00:59, John McDonnell wrote:
2.
Github user vieiro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/116
So we have a
"/home/travis/build/apache/incubator-netbeans/nbbuild/templates/projectized.xml:225:
Could not find file
/home/travis/build/apache/incubator-netbeans/libs.smack/external/smac
On 11/10/17 00:59, John McDonnell wrote:
2.
There's 1 external dependency here:
B580E446B543A8DD2F5AA368B07F9C4C9C2E7029
org.eclipse.jgit-3.6.2.201501210735-r_nosignature.jar
I'm not sure about the nosignature part, but I can find[1] this
version which I guess is the same one, but when I chan
Hi,
Regarding comments of PR #52[1], I can understand both opinions.
I want to know Apache's rule in those template cases. We just follow
it. Personally, I don't think that users want to see it.
BTW, templates[2] (e.g. apache20-license.txt) of licenses are shown
also in project properties(Right-c
Hi.
Release is dead, long live the release! I believe I have addressed the biggest
problems of my previous attempt to release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API 1.5
and it is time to try once again.
Here is the build with source ZIP, MD5 and SHA1 signatures.
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%
The discussion from
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/52 should be moved
to this thread.
> emilianbold commented 7 hours ago • edited
>
> @matthiasblaesing: so far I have been excluding template files from Rat. They
> are user visible as far as I can tell and I don't believe it's
GitHub user juneau001 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/117
[NETBEANS-54] Modeule Review j2ee.persistence
- JPA external library (Java EE) is used for test entity classes, along
with junit
- checked Rat report: everything has been relicense
Github user emilianbold commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/52
I really believe this should be discussed on dev@. There are two email
threads, one started by me and one by @junichi11 for mentors (which haven't
replied).
We are not running
>> Anton Epple : 10.10.17 @ 9:46 <<
> -1
> I’ll have to change my vote. The new implementation of JSON.java makes use
> of ClassValue:
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/ClassValue.html
>
> Classvalue is not available on Android (or iOS). This prevents porting of
> HTML/Java 1.5
thanks.
-jt
Dne 10. 10. 2017 19:31 napsal uživatel "John McDonnell" <
mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com>:
> @Jaroslav, this is fixed now, seems I found the option when browsing.
>
> Because of the way the permissions are based only about Bertrand
> Delacretaz, Geertjan Wielenga, Hermien Pellissier, Jiri P
Github user dschoorl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/7
I added notice file for jcip-annotations instead of a jcip-license file. I
changed the jsr305 license file based on the info in
http://wiki.netbeans.org/DevFaqExternalLibraries as pointed
>> 1.
>>
>> The RAT report currently lists:
>>
>>AL
>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/incubator-netbeans-linux/o.eclipse.jgit/build.xml
>>AL
>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/incubator-netbeans-linux/o.eclipse.jgit/external/binaries-list
>>AL
>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/52
I get the feeling, that we are running in circles:
- Junichi established, that there are templates that already today carry a
license header (just the wrong one) (In the I
Github user rosslamont commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/114
Sorry - should I also add the patch to the rat exclusions? What would the
comment be?
---
Github user rosslamont commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/114
Done.
---
On 10/10/17 22:31, John McDonnell wrote:
Hi,
So I took on a what I thought would be a quick and simple module to
get into this and I have a few questions:
Module: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/master/o.eclipse.jgit
1.
The RAT report currently lists:
AL
/home/jenk
Github user vieiro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/116
Note: This project (Apache license) didn't seem to have any notice file.
---
GitHub user vieiro opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/116
[NETBEANS-54] Module Review libs.smack
- Updated maven coordinates.
- Passing tests. No license headers missing.
- Still awaiting for travis beers.
You can merge this pull r
Github user rosslamont commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/114
My apologies, I assumed tests were part of the default build. Curious:
shouldn't travis be running unit tests and picking that up?
I will revert the test changes and look into
Github user emilianbold commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/52
@matthiasblaesing: so far I have been excluding template files from Rat.
They are user visible as far as I can tell and I don't believe it's good for
NetBeans to have that. Maybe there
Hi,
So I took on a what I thought would be a quick and simple module to
get into this and I have a few questions:
Module: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/master/o.eclipse.jgit
1.
The RAT report currently lists:
AL
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/incubator-netbeans
Github user vieiro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/113
It would be nice getting a pair of beers in case of build success! :-D
---
GitHub user vieiro opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/115
[NETBEANS-54] Module Review libs.jvyamlb
- Version 0.2.7 is not available in maven.central
- Downgraded to 0.2.6 to see how it behaves in travis build
- See issue #82 https:/
For simplicities sake, I've made the group 'jira-users' as
contributors, since anyone should be able to assign themselves a
ticket, not just committers since we'll want others from the community
to pick up defects and submit PR's as fixes for these issues.
I think this is how they have it on the J
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/113
Your wish was already granted - the travis configuration was added to the
repository literally hours ago. That's the reason I saw that. :-)
---
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/52
@emilianbold @junichi11 given that the html module has a GPLv2/wCPE+CDDL
license
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-netbeans-dev/201710.mbox/%3CCAEF8jVfgn
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/112
---
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 10.10.2017, 18:31 +0100 schrieb John McDonnell:
> @Jaroslav, this is fixed now, seems I found the option when browsing.
>
> Because of the way the permissions are based only about Bertrand
> Delacretaz, Geertjan Wielenga, Hermien Pellissier, Jiri Prox, Jiri
> Kovalsky, Svatop
Github user vieiro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/113
Should be ready now. Sorry for the trouble. It would be nice getting a
travis warning in case of build failure.
---
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/114
Sorry, but this breaks the unittests. In these the CSS structure is parsed
and the result is compared with a reference file. I would do this:
- revert the changes to the
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/113
Please recheck this as this breaks the build. My local build breaks
different than the protocol from travis, but reproducible. To check yourself,
please run in the repository:
Github user vieiro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/83
Just for the records, the issue is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-81
---
@Jaroslav, this is fixed now, seems I found the option when browsing.
Because of the way the permissions are based only about Bertrand
Delacretaz, Geertjan Wielenga, Hermien Pellissier, Jiri Prox, Jiri
Kovalsky, Svatopluk Dedic and myself - and yes, now Jaroslav.
Theres about 42-43 people on the
Yes, will take a look, I think everyone who is a committer should be given
the same rights.
Gj
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 at 18:20, John McDonnell
wrote:
> Sorry for the double post,
>
> But looking at the Issue Permissions it seems only users with the
> following permissions can be assigned issues:
>
Sorry for the double post,
But looking at the Issue Permissions it seems only users with the
following permissions can be assigned issues:
Project Role (Contributors)
Project Role (Committers)
Project Role (Administrators)
Project Role (PMC)
I'm not sure, maybe its Geertjan who can change your p
Hi,
I was able to assign it to myself (and un-assign it), but I don't see
your username in the list of names when it comes to assigning it to
you either - which is strange...
John
On 10 October 2017 at 18:05, ehsavoie wrote:
> Hi,
> I think Geertjan as project lead has the rights to enble you t
Hi,
I think Geertjan as project lead has the rights to enble you to change the
assignee on the project.
No more rights than you ;)
Emmanuel
--
Emmanuel Hugonnet
http://www.ehsavoie.com
http://twitter.com/ehsavoie
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am tryin
Github user ebarboni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70
I had to check on personal jenkins to see what I get from junit report. I
hope the mutliple commit and rebase were not notified.
The report are by clusters in a rat folder in cas
Hi,
I am trying to fix
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-83
and I'd like to change the assignee to myself. However I can't. Why? It
would help if people working on issues to update their status/assignee.
-jt
Tried again and the build succeeds.
When the problem occurs with the test, it seems like the build hangs, but
when I click the terminal window the build continues, takes quite a long
time, and after lots of things happening the build completes.
Gj
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Geertjan Wieleng
Hi,
Thanks Jaroslav for looking at this! If the
http://mc-repo.googlecode.com requirement can be dropped that's a Good
Thing IMO.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> ...the NetBeans maven repository at
> http://bits.netbeans.org/maven2/ shall now be responsibility of Apach
Thanks for taking look guys.
2017-10-10 12:24 GMT+02:00 Emilian Bold :
> What's also odd is that the parent pom has dependencies on NetBeans
> RELEASE80 binaries.
>
This is compile time only (provided) dependency. The
HTML/Java API is using using java.util.ServiceLoader discovery mechanism
and a
Github user geertjanw commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/114
Looks great and makes sense not to do anything with that patch and .txt
data file. Thanks for this review, great.
---
On úterý 10. října 2017 11:12:48 CEST Emilian Bold wrote:
> Since when is a NetBeans library, part of the NetBeans Platform, supposed
> to provide iOS and Android compatibility?
Since one of the implementation of the Fn.Presenter works on Android and
another on iOS. In addition to that there are
GitHub user rosslamont opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/114
[NETBEANS-54] Module Review css.lib
Added or replaced licenses:
- CssTokenId.java
- NoteType.java
- TokenAcceptorsTest.java
- itabbar.css.testfile
- all css fi
What's also odd is that the parent pom has dependencies on NetBeans
RELEASE80 binaries.
--emi
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The org.netbeans.html release that was recently prepared refers to,
> and downloads lots of stuff from a
Hi,
The org.netbeans.html release that was recently prepared refers to,
and downloads lots of stuff from a Maven repository at
http://mc-repo.googlecode.com
Why is that? Getting binaries from strange places is scary.
-Bertrand
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Didn't think of turning the report into a community thing, I think that's a
> great idea, we should I think try to do that next time...
Yeah, I think discussing a report draft here helps people reflect on
progress, and lowers the rep
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...maybe all that
> needs to be done is updating license headers to Apache and then everything
> else, including dealing with GPL binaries, can be done in subsequent
> releases
If it's GPL dependencies which are not optional I think
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> ...the build seems to deliver releasable ZIP file:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-html4j-release/16/artifact/incubating-netbeans-html4j-1.5.zip
> It's md5sum is a45bda33200c208d0d837b0746a7dcce.
Yes, I filled it out based on all the various things that have happened.
Didn't think of turning the report into a community thing, I think that's a
great idea, we should I think try to do that next time.
Gj
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 at 09:03, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:01
Yes, one thing a lot of us are assuming is that everything must be perfect
for it to be released.
In Apache, that's not the case, but then the question becomes what the
minimum requirement of the first release should be -- i.e., maybe all that
needs to be done is updating license headers to Apache
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> ...
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-83
> The issue will have to be fixed before new attempt to release 1.5 is made...
If that's easy that's cool, but note that during incubation it's
perfectly fine to have releases w
Thanks for testing this Geertjan,
can you please report a bug (component platform - HTML4J) and add stacktrace
of your stalled build in there?
Thanks.
-jt
PS: Why I cannot assign JIRA bugs (like NETBEANS-83) to myself?
On pondělí 9. října 2017 9:29:26 CEST Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> I have tes
On úterý 10. října 2017 9:46:18 CEST Anton Epple wrote:
> I’ll have to change my vote. The new implementation of JSON.java makes use
> of ClassValue:
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/ClassValue.html
>
> Classvalue is not available on Android (or iOS). This prevents porting of
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:34 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...You may want to review the content under
> http://www.apache.org/dev/#releases as well...
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html in particular has
good information about how to prepare the release.
I also often mention
http://
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...I can't follow any of those links. The fact that they come
> through across multiple lines just makes the email harder to follow...
Yes, those urldefense links are not usable on a public list.
It looks like John has provided the required
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> ...It's md5sum is a45bda33200c208d0d837b0746a7dcce. ...
While md5 is still commonly used, it is broken today [1] so we should
generally move away from it.
-Bertrand
[1]
https://natmchugh.blogspot.ch/2014/10/how-i-created-two-images-with-
Since when is a NetBeans library, part of the NetBeans Platform, supposed
to provide iOS and Android compatibility?
Actually, why is this even part of the NetBeans Platform?
--emi
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Anton Epple
wrote:
> -1
> I’ll have to change my vote. The new implementation
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:01 PM, wrote:
> ...This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2017 ...
I see that someone fleshed up that report, thanks!
It would have been good to mention the draft here so as to make the
report a community thing
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> ... * What are the requirements for a positive vote?...
The Apache voting process is described at
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
The goal is to *build consensus*, not necessarily vote on every
decision. Votes are gener
-1
I’ll have to change my vote. The new implementation of JSON.java makes use of
ClassValue:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/ClassValue.html
Classvalue is not available on Android (or iOS). This prevents porting of
HTML/Java 1.5 to Android (and iOS). Please consider to roll b
62 matches
Mail list logo
