We, everyone who is already a committer. As you know -- since you started a
voting process already.
Gj
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Emilian Bold
wrote:
> Who is "we"?
>
> --emi
>
> On joi, nov. 2, 2017 at 1:08 a.m., Jiří Kovalský
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, Jan is not listed there but we would like
Who is "we"?
--emi
On joi, nov. 2, 2017 at 1:08 a.m., Jiří Kovalský
wrote:
> Yes, Jan is not listed there but we would like him to get the committer
> access. What do we need to do in order to make this happen? Thanks a lot,
> -Jirka Dne 1.11.2017 v 22:52 Craig Russell napsal(a): > Hi Jan, >
jlahoda commented on issue #213: org.jdesktop.layout library is under LGPL and
cannot be used.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/213#issuecomment-341274646
@junichi11, right, thanks. I've forgot about that (and missed it when
looking at the patch). Sorry for that. Wil
junichi11 commented on issue #213: org.jdesktop.layout library is under LGPL
and cannot be used.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/213#issuecomment-341271195
@jlahoda It seems that the license headers are removed from *.form files
automatically.
Like everyone else, we’ll need to start a vote process for him to vote him
in, soon.
Gj
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 00:08, Jiří Kovalský wrote:
> Yes, Jan is not listed there but we would like him to get the committer
> access. What do we need to do in order to make this happen?
>
> Thanks a lot,
> -
Yes, Jan is not listed there but we would like him to get the committer
access. What do we need to do in order to make this happen?
Thanks a lot,
-Jirka
Dne 1.11.2017 v 22:52 Craig Russell napsal(a):
Hi Jan,
On Nov 1, 2017, at 7:59 AM, Jan Pirek wrote:
Hello,
based on the procedure in the
ebarboni commented on issue #215: Disabling check for maven coordinates in
RatReportTask.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/215#issuecomment-341263931
+1 make sens , some artefact are impossible to get from central.
Hi Jan,
> On Nov 1, 2017, at 7:59 AM, Jan Pirek wrote:
>
> Hello,
> based on the procedure in the
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/How+to+Participate
Could you please tell us what part of that page you are referencing? As far as
I can see, you are not listed as an origin
matthiasblaesing commented on issue #216: Adjusting header in
libs.osgi/external/osgi-5.0-license.txt, org.osgi?
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/216#issuecomment-341251411
If anyone is interest to the why I added the third entry:
- `org.osgi.compendium-4.2.0.
geertjanw commented on issue #213: org.jdesktop.layout library is under LGPL
and cannot be used.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/213#issuecomment-341239268
+1 for merging this.
This is an automated mes
svenreimers commented on issue #215: Disabling check for maven coordinates in
RatReportTask.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/215#issuecomment-341234581
Looks good for me +1
This is an automated message
geertjanw commented on issue #215: Disabling check for maven coordinates in
RatReportTask.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/215#issuecomment-341232736
+1 Makes sense to me and great.
This is an automate
geertjanw closed pull request #216: Adjusting header in
libs.osgi/external/osgi-5.0-license.txt, org.osgi?
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/216
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sak
geertjanw commented on issue #216: Adjusting header in
libs.osgi/external/osgi-5.0-license.txt, org.osgi?
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/216#issuecomment-341232503
Thanks!
This is an automated message
> I know this is a problem of mine, worring about these things, so I apologize
> for being so tiresome asking questions all the time. I’ll focus on finishing
> the licensing stuff and leave the final solution to this for later.
This is exactly the kind of questions that need to be asked. No need
Hi all,
I know I’ve been raising lots of questions about binary dependencies lately.
The fact is that I don’t feel comfortable having them stored in
hg.netbeans.org/binaries knowing this is going away. I’d prefer having as a
solid build system as we can get. I’d prefer not having to upgrade/dow
Awesome.
PR's look good to me.
Sven
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> FWIW, I've started with a Jenkins job to build release artefacts, for the
> with "9.0 alpha" platform-only release here:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/
> incubator-netbeans-rele
FWIW, I've started with a Jenkins job to build release artefacts, for the
with "9.0 alpha" platform-only release here:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-release/
Please note this is still a work-in-progress.
The idea is that the build should do very minima
jlahoda opened a new pull request #216: Adjusting header in
libs.osgi/external/osgi-5.0-license.txt, org.osgi?
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/216
?.compendium-4.2.0.jar is used now, not osgi.cmpn-4.2.jar.
-
jlahoda opened a new pull request #215: Disabling check for maven coordinates
in RatReportTask.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/215
The RatReportTask is checking that external binaries are downloaded using
maven coordinates. While In principle that check is not bad,
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> > you propose to open the PR from the
> > personal fork and leave it open for moths or years so that the code is
> > "perpetually" submitted to the ASF and can (hopefully!) be used, while
> t
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> > There was a significant time between the snapshot for the donation was
> made
> > and the donation actually happened. That's unfortunate, but I don't think
> > anybody here could do anythin
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> There was a significant time between the snapshot for the donation was made
> and the donation actually happened. That's unfortunate, but I don't think
> anybody here could do anything about that (Geertjan tried, AFAIK).
To be clear, I have no p
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> you propose to open the PR from the
> personal fork and leave it open for moths or years so that the code is
> "perpetually" submitted to the ASF and can (hopefully!) be used, while the
> actual development is still happening on a branch in a per
On 2017-11-01 17:29, Matthias Bläsing wrote:
Hey,
the big question - are there alternatives? How well does git cope with
binaries and are there experiences with big repositories?
The JNA project decided, that holding the released binaries in the git
history would be a good idea. The library i
Hey,
the big question - are there alternatives? How well does git cope with
binaries and are there experiences with big repositories?
The JNA project decided, that holding the released binaries in the git
history would be a good idea. The library itself is a few megabytes,
the repository currentl
AFAIK, the zip was created from the donation_review branch on the
http://hg.netbeans.org/releases repository. IIRC, the branch was originally
branched from default sometime in December last year, but then was updated
with default branch changes sometime in April. If I am looking right, the
last com
Well, it's something that's being worked on from the Oracle side, we'll
keep everyone updated re this.
At the same time, it's not an urgent item right now at this stage -- what
is urgent and what we need to be narrowly focused on is that we need to
wrap things up (Apache Rat, GPL-ed binaries) and
Hey,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.11.2017, 13:16 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> > ...To the best of my knowledge, getting the changes (for donated
> > modules) from
> > hg.nb.org to the incubator-netbeans repository is a work in
> > progress...
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> ...Since Apache does provide "convenience" binaries, ie. it does serve
> dependencies,
> how is it suddenly strange to have a place to store only the dependencies?...
It's different if those binaries are from Apache projects or third parties.
You know, in the old days when you just released a .tar.gz it was perfectly
acceptable to have a lib/ folder in the archive with your dependencies.
Because there was no Maven Central or whatever and doing wget from 10 different
FTP server for all the dependencies was seen as inconvenient.
Since
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:32 AM Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
> > -code provenance: when one opens a pull request against
> > apache/(incubating-)netbeans, then I think the code can be considered to
> be
> > submitted to ASF (per iCLA). Pushing a commi
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> ...is there any reason INFRA could not provide us a basic FTP account to
> carry on http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries under Apache?...
It depends on the cost, and hosting third-party binaries that we do
not control might be a problem.
But mayb
Actually, is there any reason INFRA could not provide us a basic FTP account to
carry on http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries under Apache?
Then we wouldn't have to use OSUOSL, which are also an Apache mirror provider,
so they already have a separate deal with the ASF.
This whole setup is just a way
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> ...In the future http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries might be going away, but we
> still have http://netbeans.osuosl.org/binaries/
> which is under my control...
Note that any such resources should be put under control of the
NetBeans PPMC,
If we cannot use Maven Central or some other "big" official repositories that
guarantee some integrity, then we might as well use our own setup.
In the future http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries might be going away, but we still
have http://netbeans.osuosl.org/binaries/ which is under my control and
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> > when one opens a pull request against
> > apache/(incubating-)netbeans, then I think the code can be considered to
> be
> > submitted to ASF (per iCLA).
>
> IANAL but that sounds right.
>
geertjanw commented on issue #213: org.jdesktop.layout library is under LGPL
and cannot be used.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/213#issuecomment-341092473
Thanks for this work, great to have this covered now.
geertjanw closed pull request #211: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review refactoring.java
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/211
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this i
geertjanw commented on issue #211: [NETBEANS-54] Module Review refactoring.java
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/211#issuecomment-341092126
Thanks, merging.
This is an automated message from the Apache G
geertjanw closed pull request #214: disabled failing tests
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/214
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign pull reque
geertjanw commented on issue #214: disabled failing tests
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/214#issuecomment-341091990
Thanks, merging.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> ...To the best of my knowledge, getting the changes (for donated modules) from
> hg.nb.org to the incubator-netbeans repository is a work in progress...
I don't know how many changes this represents, but IMO the simplest
way to bring them
There was a significant time between the snapshot for the donation was made
and the donation actually happened. That's unfortunate, but I don't think
anybody here could do anything about that (Geertjan tried, AFAIK).
So, basically, during the gap, people could either work on the original
repositor
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> when one opens a pull request against
> apache/(incubating-)netbeans, then I think the code can be considered to be
> submitted to ASF (per iCLA).
IANAL but that sounds right.
> for a long-running branch in a
> personal repository, if the autho
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:32 AM Jan Lahoda wrote:
> -code provenance: when one opens a pull request against
> apache/(incubating-)netbeans, then I think the code can be considered to be
> submitted to ASF (per iCLA). Pushing a commit to a personal github
> repository does not feel that way. So, fo
Hey Jessie,
Am Dienstag, den 31.10.2017, 20:23 -0400 schrieb Jesse Glick:
> I ask because there appear to be at least some divergent changes. For
> example,
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/commits/master/jshell.su
> pport/src/org/netbeans/modules/jshell/support/ShellSession.java
matthiasblaesing commented on issue #205: NETBEANS-109 fix server generation
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/205#issuecomment-341057023
I reworded the commit message a bit and merged it into master. Thank you!
-
asfgit closed pull request #205: NETBEANS-109 fix server generation
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/205
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign p
Hi all,
PROBLEM:
The mylyn binaries are not available in Maven central. Nor in any other
Maven repository.
SOLUTION:
We could use the eclipse downloads system, with automatic mirror
selection, with [1].
So, for instance, to download the jar file
org.eclipse.mylyn.tasks.core_3.17.0.v20150
50 matches
Mail list logo
