It's good to have an ICLA but we might miss valuable contributions by being too
bureaucratic.
In my view simple PRs don't need an ICLA. This include basic fixes,
documentation tweaks, simple features, etc.
Don't ask users to expressly send a signed scanned ICLA file. Remember to
mention a PGP
I believe we already use Java 8 in NetBeans sources. I remember adding a patch
with streams.
JavaFX doesn't exist on some platforms like the Raspberry PI ARM builds so I'm
not certain it's good to rely on right now. "Pretty soon" though OracleJDK will
merge into OpenJDK so I assume this means m
That's because you're not running the annotation processors.
But before digging into that, how are you going to build the patched
external binaries NetBeans requires to run? Have you given a thought to
that?
Cheers,
Antonio
El 26/11/17 a las 02:28, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
On Sat, 2
Welcome, Ioannis,
You may want to take a look at our wiki at
Wiki
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65873923
Cheers,
Antonio
El 26/11/17 a las 00:02, Ioannis Torounoglou escribió:
Hello everybody!!!
I'm new here willing to help!
I don't know where to start a
junichi11 commented on issue #253: Extend the SizeEqualsZero Java hint to look
for Yoda conditions
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/253#issuecomment-346981556
Hello @dtrebbien,
I asked about it via ML, just in case :)
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/73540
Thanks a lot for your answers!
It seems that iCLA is required in some projects (from Antonio's link).
However, it seems that we can merge PRs without ICLA(from Matthias and
Geertjan's comments).
I thought that contributors should sign an iCLA. Because I needed an
OCLA when I provided patches to (
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 12:29:30 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
>
> Presently stuck at
>
> java.lang.AssertionError: Has to be NbRepository:
> org.openide.filesystems.Repository@3ab8ef5a
> at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.start(Main.java:281)
> at
> org.netbeans.core.startup.T
Hello everybody!!!
I'm new here willing to help!
I don't know where to start and what to do!
Any help will be great!
J!
Hi all,
Would it be ok to use Java 8 for NetBeans sources? Or is there a maximum
version? Can we count on JavaFX being installed for the IDE to run?
AFAIK JavaFX is not a requirement but, should it be?
Thanks,
Antonio
lbruun commented on issue #293: [NETBEANS-161] edited some malformed/forgotten
license headers
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/293#issuecomment-346970296
I think all changes in this PR looks good.
The reason why #282 didn't find these ones is because it delibe
Upload one or more resulting jars, for we to review.
Our pleasure helping out! :-)
El 25/11/17 a las 22:39, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:33:17 +0100
Antonio wrote:
Hi,
Please upload the result somewhere so we can take a look by tomorrow.
Upload what? My repo cha
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:48:59 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> I was missing openide.filesystems.compat8
>
> With that I get new errors, proress!!!
False alarm... That just caused an exception with asm missing. Once I
added that, back to error... g :(
java.lang.AssertionError: Has to
I was missing openide.filesystems.compat8
With that I get new errors, proress!!!
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 12:29:30 -0500
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
>
> Presently stuck at
>
> java.lang.AssertionError: Has to be NbRepository:
> org.openide.filesystems.Repository@3ab8ef5a
> at org.netbean
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:33:17 +0100
Antonio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please upload the result somewhere so we can take a look by tomorrow.
Upload what? My repo changes or the actual jars produced? I can push
out changes. I can send link to live jars on my system. Either way.
Thanks for the assistance a
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:24:38 +0100
Antonio wrote:
>
> _ALL_ the files. This includes nested directories and their contents.
> META-INF/services/* is key for NetBeans to run. There may be some
> other files there as well. Keep the structure as is.
I am copying them over as they exist in src/. J
Hi,
Please upload the result somewhere so we can take a look by tomorrow.
Cheers,
Antonio
El 25/11/17 a las 22:29, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
Fixed warning, but still fails. Thinking something is missing from
/usr/share/netbeans-9/config/Modules/
Or its not seeing modules in
/usr/share/
Fixed warning, but still fails. Thinking something is missing from
/usr/share/netbeans-9/config/Modules/
Or its not seeing modules in
/usr/share/netbeans-9/modules/
I put the auto files when they exist in
/usr/share/netbeans-9/config/ModuleAutoDep/
Not sure but clearly something is missing or
El 25/11/17 a las 22:09, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:03:06 +0100
Antonio wrote:
El 25/11/17 a las 21:46, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
Great thanks, but that is not needed as much as other stuff. Though
I may need to know what modules I should link into a defa
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:03:06 +0100
Antonio wrote:
> El 25/11/17 a las 21:46, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
> > Great thanks, but that is not needed as much as other stuff. Though
> > I may need to know what modules I should link into a default minimal
> > install. Still working on getting that
El 25/11/17 a las 21:46, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
Great thanks, but that is not needed as much as other stuff. Though I
may need to know what modules I should link into a default minimal
install. Still working on getting that started. No UI atm. Though I
think I know why. Duplicate entr
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 21:13:26 +0100
Antonio wrote:
>
> The problem when trying to compile NetBeans modules is handling
> dependencies properly. You need to compile some modules before some
> others.
Yes but that works itself out. As I build one piece, it needs stuff
from another. I just keep pac
Hi,
Some comments inlined below.
El 25/11/17 a las 20:20, William L. Thomson Jr. escribió:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:59:47 +0100
Antonio wrote:
Hi,
I'm afraid I'm confused.
The subject of your email says "Packaging NetBeans 9 on Gentoo" but
then you're not packaging NetBeans 9 on Gentoo, but
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:59:47 +0100
Antonio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm afraid I'm confused.
>
> The subject of your email says "Packaging NetBeans 9 on Gentoo" but
> then you're not packaging NetBeans 9 on Gentoo, but packaging
> NetBeans in "abnormal ways" using the Gentoo packaging system.
>
> Why
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 20:21:11 +0200
Emilian Bold wrote:
>
> I hope you pull it off. And I'm curious if you build becomes any
> faster (meaning -- are Gentoo builds parallel with -j or something?).
I will, I am determined like that. I am not sure if it will be faster.
Yes Gentoo portage can merge m
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 13:15:51 -0500
Emilian Bold wrote:
> Antonio, he's not using our ant build system at all. Basically trying
> to build NetBeans using only our sources and the Gentool build
> scripts/-specific tools.
>
> It's extra work but doable in the end. Might be interesting if it
> works
steffendietz commented on issue #293: [NETBEANS-161] edited some
malformed/forgotten license headers
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/293#issuecomment-346957135
Maybe @lbruun can review this. :+1:
This
Antonio, he's not using our ant build system at all. Basically trying to build
NetBeans using only our sources and the Gentool build scripts/-specific tools.
It's extra work but doable in the end. Might be interesting if it works.
--emi
> Original Message
>Subject: Re: Packagi
steffendietz opened a new pull request #293: [NETBEANS-161] edited some
malformed/forgotten license headers
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/293
Hi,
I found some files which had malformed license header introducers and thus
weren't found
by the script of #28
Hi,
I'm afraid I'm confused.
The subject of your email says "Packaging NetBeans 9 on Gentoo" but then
you're not packaging NetBeans 9 on Gentoo, but packaging NetBeans in
"abnormal ways" using the Gentoo packaging system.
Why are you packaging NetBeans in "abnormal ways"? What are these
"ab
Greetings all,
Just starting a thread here since I did on the old mailing list. Just
to recap for those who missed it. I am packaging Netbeans in abnormal
ways using Gentoo packaging system. I am not using Netbeans ant build
system. That was in use on Gentoo but is to cumbersome.
This new approac
The nbbuild project can be opened with no problems. The build-nozip target
on the nbbuild runs OK, but I see no difference.
This is how the netbeans project looks like when opened as a whole top
level project:
https://imgur.com/GIZTkBY
The nbbuild project view:
https://imgur.com/tph5uyA
The Open P
matthiasblaesing commented on issue #248: adding crlf characters for the
failing tests in api.templates
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/248#issuecomment-346941988
Merged as "trivial fix" without an iCLA. Thanks for looking into this.
asfgit closed pull request #248: adding crlf characters for the failing tests
in api.templates
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/248
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provena
Yes. The merging of a PR must be done by a committer, i.e., someone with
iCLA, etc, but a PR can be provided by anybody, with or without committer
status.
Gj
On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 at 05:07, Junichi Yamamoto
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now, there are some PRs for bugs(Not [NETBEANS-54] Module Review) in
>
Hey,
Am Samstag, den 25.11.2017, 12:21 +0100 schrieb Antonio:
> I would prefer so. Otherwise the contributions should be rejected, IMHO.
>
> The Apache OFBiz, for example, introduced this policy in 2014, as per [1].
>
> Signing the ICLA is very easy, and gives us the confidence that we won't
>
I would prefer so. Otherwise the contributions should be rejected, IMHO.
The Apache OFBiz, for example, introduced this policy in 2014, as per [1].
Signing the ICLA is very easy, and gives us the confidence that we won't
be sued in the future because someone is claiming intellectual rights
ove
How about opening the nbbuild project?
If that opens fine, attempt the 'build-nozip' target (its the same as
what you've done from the command line but you never know...). That
should build Apache NetBeans 9 ide from sources. From there I would
then attempt to try opening up the 'core.network' f
I've thought so as well. But I've cloned twice and deleted the Netbeans
cache.
Any ideas what could be the culprit?
Ant 1.10.1 / Win
2017-11-24 22:58 GMT+01:00 John McDonnell :
> Maybe something didn't clone correctly?
>
> I've updated my local just there and opened the core.network project
> wit
38 matches
Mail list logo
