Hi Matthias,
Some comments inlined below.
El 23/05/2018 a las 20:22, Matthias Bläsing escribió:
Hey all,
we have artifacts we will need to distribute, but (potentially) can't
hold in the repository. Apache has a statement on this:
[...]
I'll package the files with correct license attributi
On 2018-05-23 14:51, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
The vote for rc1-rc1 is in the IPMC thread now.
Ate gave his +1. Other mentors, please vote there too.
I didn't yet give my +1 before, but did so just now.
Ate
Gj
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018, Emilian Bold wrote:
Which are those jira ticket
On 2018-05-23 20:57, Emilian Bold wrote:
Ate, could we get a vote on this release?
Sure :-)
If you look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we
are already making progress on the (non-blocking) issues reported.
Yes, thanks for creating the fol
Ate, could we get a vote on this release?
If you look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we
are already making progress on the (non-blocking) issues reported.
--emi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 21 May 2018 3:54 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> I'm i
You are talking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-856
I have opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-387 to clarify what
they meant in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-111
Let's see what legal says. Maybe we just remove those files from the source zip
bu
Hey all,
we have artifacts we will need to distribute, but (potentially) can't
hold in the repository. Apache has a statement on this:
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#no-modification
I consider this bad practise, as it means the project will depend on
potentially fragile third party h
Thanks Jan / Christian. Closed EDL-1.0 issue.
--emi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 23 May 2018 7:17 PM, Christian Bourque wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From what I'm reading here:
>
> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
>
> JGit's licence (EDL-1.0) is compatible with the Apache li
Hi,
>From what I'm reading here:
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
JGit's licence (EDL-1.0) is compatible with the Apache licence...
C.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Emilian Bold
wrote:
> $ cat nbbuild/netbeans/LICENSE | egrep "ISO-8879-SGML|EDL-1.0|W3C2|
> OASIS|WSDL
$ cat nbbuild/netbeans/LICENSE | egrep
"ISO-8879-SGML|EDL-1.0|W3C2|OASIS|WSDL-2004"
ide/modules/org-eclipse-jgit-java7.jarEDL-1.0
ide/modules/org-eclipse-jgit.jar EDL-1.0
html.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/html/editor/resource
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Emilian Bold
wrote:
> We received this feedback and a -1 vote on the general@incubator VOTE
> thread:
>
> > A number of licenses mentioned in the LICENSE file are not mentioned
> > at https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html, have they been cleared
> > and if so
But are we even using those licenses? For what exactly?
Gj
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018, Emilian Bold wrote:
> We received this feedback and a -1 vote on the general@incubator VOTE
> thread:
>
> > A number of licenses mentioned in the LICENSE file are not mentioned
> > at https://www.apache.org/l
We received this feedback and a -1 vote on the general@incubator VOTE thread:
> A number of licenses mentioned in the LICENSE file are not mentioned
> at https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html, have they been cleared
> and if so do we have URLs of those clearances or discussions?
>
> That's t
The vote for rc1-rc1 is in the IPMC thread now.
Ate gave his +1. Other mentors, please vote there too.
Gj
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018, Emilian Bold wrote:
> > Which are those jira tickets, do you have an URL for them?
>
> PS: They are all tracked on the page for RC1: https://cwiki.apache.org/
>
> Which are those jira tickets, do you have an URL for them?
PS: They are all tracked on the page for RC1:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1
NETBEANS-823 - Ant JARs license/notice OPEN
NETBEANS-824 - bindex-2.2.jar license/notice OPEN
NETBEANS-825 - c
Chris, no need to repeat this. I don't like it, other people are confused about
it too. We won't use it in the future. Let's stick to the voting, shall we?
--emi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 23 May 2018 2:41 PM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> Rc1-rc1 really? oO
>
> Von: Emilian Bold
>
> Ges
Rc1-rc1 really? oO
Von: Emilian Bold
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2018 13:36
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1
> As for now, I'm still confused...is this VOTE still ongoing, and is it
>
> about the artifacts found at
>
> ht
> As for now, I'm still confused...is this VOTE still ongoing, and is it
>
> about the artifacts found at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-rc1-rc1/
Yes.
Ate mentioned some remaining comments from 9.0-Beta-RC3. We are now votin
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Neil C Smith wrote:
> ...Yes, Emi suggested elsewhere we might use a specific vote suffix instead -
> eg. rc1-vote1 which might be a good idea, if we need one at all?!..
Each VOTE thread must be about one specific set of artifacts, clearly
identified.
If NetBeans
On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 11:50 Christian Lenz wrote:
> I was confused, in the early days of the beta Phase too. I only know
> Alpha, beta and RC but not Beta RC. This was really confusing and as we can
> see, it is still confusing for some users. I don’t know what Beta RC1 – RC3
> meant but anyway,
I was confused, in the early days of the beta Phase too. I only know Alpha,
beta and RC but not Beta RC. This was really confusing and as we can see, it is
still confusing for some users. I don’t know what Beta RC1 – RC3 meant but
anyway, we had it.
Only my 2 cents.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Bertra
The reference to RC3 is of the Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta. We
are now working on the RC1 of Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 RC1.
Gj
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> (dropping general@incubator.a.o - votes happen on the NetBeans
(dropping general@incubator.a.o - votes happen on the NetBeans dev
list before moving there)
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:57 PM, Emilian Bold
wrote:
>> b) Justin provided detailed feedback on the 9.0-Beta-RC3 on (possible)
> I have created 26 NETBEANS JIRA issues with Justin's remarks and we'l
Thanks, Bertrand!!
El 23/05/2018 a las 10:25, Bertrand Delacretaz escribió:
Hi,
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Antonio wrote:
Should be ready now
Ok, done, details at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-636
-Bertrand
---
Hello,
I don't know this area that well so I figured I mention this idea and people
that recently worked on that perhaps implement it faster than me.
For example on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-842 we have
stax2-api.jar which has a BSD license in META-INF/LICENSE
Inside websv
Hi,
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Antonio wrote:
> Should be ready now
Ok, done, details at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-636
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apach
25 matches
Mail list logo
