+1 for not bundling jdk...
-Sven
Scott Palmer schrieb am Mo., 2. Juli 2018, 19:31:
> +1 JDK doesn’t have to be embedded, and I for one would prefer that it
> isn’t as I will be updating the JDK independently of NetBeans anyway.
>
> Scott
>
>
> > On Jul 2, 2018, at 12:36 PM, Emilian Bold
> >
That helps. Updates now, would not at all before. Still lacks the Java Source
Base Plugin, but that is no concern as long as it is fixed eventually. Will
use well until then. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Gary Bello [mailto:gary.be...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2018 5:25 P
+1 JDK doesn’t have to be embedded, and I for one would prefer that it isn’t
as I will be updating the JDK independently of NetBeans anyway.
Scott
> On Jul 2, 2018, at 12:36 PM, Emilian Bold
> wrote:
>
> For starters we could have a disk image without the JDK and users will just
> have to
In my case the error shows up when I initialize the program. It doesn't affect
anything that I can tell. This IS when I simply use it. As I said I don't
even know how to update this version, so that's not an issue.
-Original Message-
From: Geertjan Wielenga [mailto:geertjan.wiele...@g
+1 to native installer
Josh Juneau
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> On Jul 2, 2018, at 11:36 AM, Emilian Bold
> wrote:
>
> For starters we could have a disk image without the JDK and users will just
> have to install Java before in
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 18:40:36 +0200
Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
> The ant email task will not work with the current trunk, when run
> with JDK10.
>
> The solution would be according to ant-dev to download the JAF
> yourself.
>
> A quick look at the license [1] and /home/legal [2] shows JAF has a
>
The ant email task will not work with the current trunk, when run with
JDK10.
The solution would be according to ant-dev to download the JAF yourself.
A quick look at the license [1] and /home/legal [2] shows JAF has a CDDL
license and this license is allowed for binary distribution by apac
For starters we could have a disk image without the JDK and users will just
have to install Java before installing NetBeans.
Signing of the installer would also be nice but it's not mandatory. Baby steps.
--emi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 2 July 2018 1:34 PM, Paul Franz wrote:
> +1
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, 11:35 Paul Franz, wrote:
> +1
>
> One thing to remember is that the JDK needs to be embedded in the app.
>
Which is where I believe we may run into problems with Apache policies? If
so, I think we need to push the case that the world is changing!
+1 to this, and replacing th
+1
One thing to remember is that the JDK needs to be embedded in the app.
Also, macOS really should be signed.
Paul Franz
Senior Principal Applications Engineer
Oracle Transportation Management
On 2 Jul 2018, at 4:32, Sven Reimers wrote:
+1 for a native mac image..
-Sven
Emilian Bold sc
Hi Jan,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:53 AM Jan Lahoda wrote:
> ...Any idea how to move that forward? It would be awesome if we could compile
> our launchers and not use the legacy ones
Doesn't LEGAL-390 answer your concerns?
IANAL but it sounds like with the right information in your LICENCE
+1 for a native mac image..
-Sven
Emilian Bold schrieb am Mo., 2. Juli
2018, 09:56:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to have a convenience binary disk image for macOS.
>
> It's not very complicated to do once you have the zip contents.
>
> We also need a build slave with macOS I believe. I have an old
Hello,
I would like to have a convenience binary disk image for macOS.
It's not very complicated to do once you have the zip contents.
We also need a build slave with macOS I believe. I have an older mac with macOS
Sierra (I think) that I could configure to run builds for NetBeans. That is, if
13 matches
Mail list logo
