Hi,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 23:11, Antonio wrote:
> We now have https://netbeans.apache.org/javadoc/dev/index.html
>...
> Jenkins job is at
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/incubator-netbeans-website-javadoc/
> the initial commit [3] is quite big: more than 13000 files and
Hi,
I think that's a good idea. I'll do it, unless someone beats me to it.
Do we want one javadoc package for (full) IDE and one for platform, or just
the one for full IDE? (I suspect the former.)
Thanks,
Jan
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:21 AM Antonio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Shall we generate a
Hi Yann,
Well, it is great you managed to generate the artifacts. Eric Barboni, also
on this mailing list, is working on a solution for publishing Maven
artifacts, too. Would be good to team up with him.
Yes, I also believe it is more compatible to stick to the org.netbeans.*
groupIds. Especially
Hi,
Adding 9.0 will require checking out the 9.0 branch, building javadoc
and publishing it. I don't think it's worth building a jenkins for this,
but it would be good having it for future NetBeans releases.
I think it's worth exploring the proxy approach Neil was talking about
in another th
Hi all,
Shall we generate a javadoc zip file and include it to the release binaries?
I'm asking because this is going to be a big zip file, and we may want
to distribute it through the Apache Mirror System. Also having javadoc
zip files is useful for NetBeans RCP programming.
AFAIK (I'm not
Here it is:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/10vc1
Gj
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:34 AM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> We need to put up a 10vc1 Wiki where we list all issues we identify in
> 10vc1 so we can track those and decide what to do with
No, the Apache terminology is voting candidate. That's what this is and
please take a look again at the NetCAT schedule, i.e., this voting
candidate is for NetCAT:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
Thanks,
Gj
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:06 AM László Kishalm
I meant: I'm not sure that we need to vote on this. It's more like a beta.
Shouldn't we have called it beta at first? Just for the further release
processes...
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018, 17:54 Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> -1
>
> Well, I've used Emilian's mail as a template, I'm sure that we actually
> nee
We need to put up a 10vc1 Wiki where we list all issues we identify in
10vc1 so we can track those and decide what to do with them.
Gj
On Wednesday, October 3, 2018, Eirik Bakke wrote:
> I just tried 10vc1 and can confirm that NETBEANS-1308 (Windows launcher
> fails to suppress console) is stil
Awesome, this is great to see. If this works and is not problematic, let’s
do it. Re adding 9.0, what is needed to do that?
Gj
On Wednesday, October 3, 2018, Antonio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We now have https://netbeans.apache.org/javadoc/dev/index.html
>
> This is experimental. Things may be still
Before the PPMC vote, there’s the NetCAT process first. See the NetCAT
schedule.
Very many thanks for putting the vc1 together. Awesome. Now we have a
common basis for kicking the tires, identifying problems, and doing NetCAT.
But it is too early for the PPMC vote.
Gj
On Wednesday, October 3, 20
I just tried 10vc1 and can confirm that NETBEANS-1308 (Windows launcher fails
to suppress console) is still present.
-- Eirik
-Original Message-
From: Eirik Bakke
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2018 9:09 PM
To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Pull Request review before NetB
-1
Well, I've used Emilian's mail as a template, I'm sure that we actually
need to vote this time.
There will be more candidates on the road, but let's the tests begin!
On 10/02/2018 05:49 PM, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)!
If th
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)!
If this voting candidate passes, another similar voting will be started
ongene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can release
this version. This build will also undergo validation through NetCAT.
Apache
Hi all,
We now have https://netbeans.apache.org/javadoc/dev/index.html
This is experimental. Things may be still syncing (if you see a 404
please retry). Note that we're uploading .zip files for each module
([1], [2]) as well.
Jenkins job is at
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Pro
Hi guys,
I'm used to create applications/plugins based on the Netbeans platform. I'd
like to migrate my apps to Netbeans 9 but I didn't find maven archetypes on a
public maven repository.
Thanks to an email sent by John McDonnell titled "Jenkins Builds" I managed to
build them from the sources
Awesome!!!
Gj
On Tuesday, October 2, 2018, Laszlo Kishalmi
wrote:
> Well, checked the artifacts from 344. They are Ok.
> I've started the build with VERSION parameter 10.0-vc1, that should finish
> in 2 hours.
>
> I'm signing and publishing the 10.0-vc1 right after that.
>
>
>
> On 10/02/2018 1
Well, checked the artifacts from 344. They are Ok.
I've started the build with VERSION parameter 10.0-vc1, that should
finish in 2 hours.
I'm signing and publishing the 10.0-vc1 right after that.
On 10/02/2018 10:58 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Yes, stick to the current setup.
Gj
On Tue,
Yes, stick to the current setup.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:57 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> This seems to be the build that we should use:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-release/344/
>
> You should be able to build yourself, see step 2
This seems to be the build that we should use:
https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-release/344/
You should be able to build yourself, see step 2 here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+Release+README
Gj
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:51 PM Laszlo Kisha
Thanks Jan!
The job just finished successfully, right now we have 2 source and two
binary distribution for platform and the whole IDE.
Do we want to split the whole IDE for first vc (or at all?) or we can
stick to the current setup?
See:
https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/jo
Hi
I created the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1335
I started the template also but it is not deployed yet.
Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Geertjan Wielenga
Envoyé : mardi 2 octobre 2018 12:12
À : dev
Objet : Re: Apache officier or member for IP clearean
And I've added a new item "Making sure you have the right permissions", so
that we know for future reference what a release manager needs before
getting started:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+Release+README
I.e., all the hurdles we're working on solving (mix
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 3:55 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Please assign permissions to
> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/group/hudson-jobadmin.
> See the above, apparently project mentors can do this...
Looks like I don't have karma to do that, I don't see a modify button
at https://whimsy.ap
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17082
Please assign permissions to
https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/group/hudson-jobadmin.
See the above, apparently project mentors can do this.
If not, can you indicate as such in the issue and specify who we should ask
for this.
Thanks,
Gj
Awesome. Laszlo, you're set and ready for going on in putting together the
first voting candidate as this specific hurdle is now sorted out.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:29 PM Jan Lahoda wrote:
> FWIW, I've just changed to release job to checkout from the "release100"
> branch.
>
> Jan
>
> On Tu
FWIW, I've just changed to release job to checkout from the "release100"
branch.
Jan
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:32 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Follow up question for Laszlo -- what is it that you need to do there, just
> so we're all on the same page and can see whether we're on the same page?
Use this build (until Laszlo provides voting candidate 1) and, in the
issue, describe from scratch what to do to reproduce the problem with clear
steps:
https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-netbeans-linux/854/artifact/
Gj
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:06 PM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@g
Need steps to reproduce, can you provide them (not here, in the issue,
please), right now it cannot be fixed without that.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:03 PM Gilberto wrote:
> Guys, I didn't see the NETBEANS-882 [1].
>
> I think it critical.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gilberto
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apa
Guys, I didn't see the NETBEANS-882 [1].
I think it critical.
Regards,
Gilberto
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-882
On 2018/10/01 04:21:45, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> Dear all,>
>
> I'm happy to announce that our release 10 has been branched from master >
> on 21:00 PST
Excellent, thanks for your work, if/when you can answer Bertrand's
questions that will help too, yes, the ticket too when you're ready.
Everyone really wants the Apache NetBeans Maven artefacts to be published
and available, so you're doing great and important work, write back
whenever there are p
Hi Geertjan,
Sorry I did not see Bertrand email (only received today).
With the help of Milos Kleint we try to get all the separate artefacts in one
repository that may be zippable instead of 8 separate code donation.
Have done that for the moment(
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ
Removed that statement from the report.
Gj
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:07 AM Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I think we can remove that item from the report if that helps, especially
> since everyone who needs to know is aware of it now.
>
> Would that be OK, to remo
Hi Eric,
Can you do these things? Does it seem doable to you, is this the right
approach from your point of view?
Thanks,
Gj
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:10 PM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:31 AM Eric Barboni wrote:
> > ...As I'm not Apache officier or Apache m
I think we can remove that item from the report if that helps, especially
since everyone who needs to know is aware of it now.
Would that be OK, to remove that item from the report?
Gj
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:54 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:49 PM Geertjan Wielenga
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:49 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
>... OK, done, added a URL to the issue...
Ok, it would be good to briefly summarize at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16946 what you think is
"in limbo", the long block of pasted conversation there deserves a
summary I think.
Hey,
I didn’t know how it was handled but the repos add the label hacktoberfest to
their issues. The problem with our repo is, that we don’t show our issues,
because it is in jira. I don’t know whether it is possible to sync issues from
jira to GitHub, to Benefit from the hacktoberfest.
Don’t
Follow up question for Laszlo -- what is it that you need to do there, just
so we're all on the same page and can see whether we're on the same page?
Secondly, you need to be added here:
https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/group/hudson-jobadmin
That should be done during today.
Gj
On Tue, Oct
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17082
Gj
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 8:30 AM John McDonnell
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think this is a infra job to change your permissions on Jenkins.
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
> On Tue 2 Oct 2018, 01:02 Laszlo Kishalmi,
> wrote:
>
> > It seems we need to alter the
39 matches
Mail list logo
