Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache (Re: Options, options (was Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache))

2018-10-03 Thread Antonio
On 03/10/18 00:10, Antonio wrote: Hi all, We now have https://netbeans.apache.org/javadoc/dev/index.html [...] - Update the current jbake website jenkins job to avoid removing the "javadoc" directory whenever a change is published (pushing to the website will remove javadocs right now). [

Re: nb-javac AssertionError compiling valid code

2018-10-03 Thread Jeffrey Morlan
This bug is still present in nb-javac 1.5 On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > Hey this is awesome. > > You came across a problem, identified the cause, fixed it, and provided a > pull request. > > That is really great. Yes, thos

Re: [Mentors] lkishalmi permissions to Jenkins for Apache NetBeans

2018-10-03 Thread Mark Struberg
Added. LieGrue, strub > Am 02.10.2018 um 16:01 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz : > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 3:55 PM Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: >> ...Please assign permissions to >> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/group/hudson-jobadmin. >> See the above, apparently project mentors can do this... >

Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache (Re: Options, options (was Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache))

2018-10-03 Thread Antonio
Hi Neil, I think it's worth exploring this path. Let me know if I can be of help on this. Cheers, Antonio El 03/10/2018 a las 8:38, Neil C Smith escribió: Hi, On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 23:11, Antonio wrote: We now have https://netbeans.apache.org/javadoc/dev/index.html ... Jenkins job is at h

Re: [Mentors] Altering the Release job

2018-10-03 Thread Antonio
Hi, I'd go with whichever is best for autocompletion while building NetBeans RCP apps (but I don't know which one that is). Cheers, Antonio El 03/10/2018 a las 8:14, Jan Lahoda escribió: Hi, I think that's a good idea. I'll do it, unless someone beats me to it. Do we want one javadoc packa

Re: Apache officier or member for IP cleareance

2018-10-03 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:18 AM Eric Barboni wrote: > ...I created the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1335 > I started the template also but it is not deployed yet... thank you, I have commented at NETBEANS-1335 -Bertrand -

RE: Apache officier or member for IP cleareance

2018-10-03 Thread Eric Barboni
Hi I created the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1335 I started the template also but it is not deployed yet. Regards Eric -Message d'origine- De : Geertjan Wielenga Envoyé : mardi 2 octobre 2018 12:12 À : dev Objet : Re: Apache officier or member for IP clearean

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 1]

2018-10-03 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Well, let's not complicate things, I think. And, yes, there's always a chance the first candidate is the winner. Gj On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:21 AM Neil C Smith wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, 06:15 Geertjan Wielenga, > wrote: > > > No, the Apache terminology is voting candidate. That's what this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 1]

2018-10-03 Thread Neil C Smith
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, 06:15 Geertjan Wielenga, wrote: > No, the Apache terminology is voting candidate. That's what this is ... > Surely this would be good as beta or release candidate? Voting candidate is only the mark of the release before it gets voted through. And I'm assuming this won't be th