There are two OSGi containers in NetBeans. Felix and Netbinox. The platform
can use any of them. IDE uses Netbinox (as for example Mylyn bundles do not
run on Felix).
Updating containers is a matter of replacing the JARs and passing all the
module tests.
-jt
so 10. 11. 2018 v 13:29 odesílatel Ne
Hi Ryan,
I just pulled down the latest from incubator-netbeans and it built okay on my
Mac. Are you on Windows or another OS?
Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> On Nov 10, 2018, at 9:50 PM, Ryan Cuprak
Hi,
I just updated to the most recent code and the build failed, has anyone else
ran into this?
-Ryan
[nbmerge] Failed to build target: all-j2ee.eclipselink
BUILD FAILED
/Users/rcuprak/open-source/netbeans/nbbuild/build.xml:478: The following error
occurred while executing this line:
/Users
> @Oliver Rettig
> I use the possiblity, that the users can dynamically add nb modules very
> intensive and also
> the possitlibty that needed lib modules are automatically added if needed ...
But how often do your users add / remove modules (or enable/disable)?
And how important is the dynamic a
+1
It works fine for me.
-jt
čt 8. 11. 2018 v 18:56 odesílatel Ludovic HOCHET napsal:
> +1
> Thanks for the Windows launcher fix.
>
> Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 07:50, Laszlo Kishalmi a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating)!
> >
> > If this votin
Dear members of the Apache NetBeans community.
I have prepared second attempt of HTML/Java 1.6 bits and uploaded them
to [Apache Nexus](https://repository.apache.org/) staging repository.
The upload is the final piece in the whole HTML/Java API donation process -
it was only possible now, when the
OK, the proposed bits are rejected then. I'll prepare new ones and initiate
new vote. Thanks for testing.
-jt
út 6. 11. 2018 v 8:09 odesílatel Anton Epple
napsal:
> -1 In the meantime I had some failing tests when testing with dukescript
> presenters and I confirmed with Jaroslav that the issue
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 at 09:35, Emilian Bold wrote:
> Having a hybrid module system is a neat trick yet I don't see people
> raving about it. I wonder if it wouldn't help simplify this long term.
How does all this relate to things like this, and the comments about
using third-party libraries as OSG
Hi,
what are the features we will lost, if we use OSGI? Are the features we can win
with OSGI?
Maybe we can start a wiki page to collect the things.
I use the possiblity, that the users can dynamically add nb modules very
intensive and also
the possitlibty that needed lib modules are automati
Having a hybrid module system is a neat trick yet I don't see people
raving about it. I wonder if it wouldn't help simplify this long term.
Since we are under Apache and they do have OSGi containers, we could
elect to just stick to OSGi and deprecate NBMs. Except our own module
system is much neat
10 matches
Mail list logo