On 07/26/2018 07:49 PM, Antonio wrote:
El 26/07/2018 a las 9:55, Bertrand Delacretaz escribió:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:58 PM Antonio wrote:
... I've raised the [MENTORS] flag with two kind requests for
clarification :-)...
I'm not sure what you are asking exactly, can you reformulat
El 26/07/2018 a las 9:55, Bertrand Delacretaz escribió:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:58 PM Antonio wrote:
... I've raised the [MENTORS] flag with two kind requests for clarification
:-)...
I'm not sure what you are asking exactly, can you reformulate? Or
start new threads for clarity.
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:58 PM Antonio wrote:
>... I've raised the [MENTORS] flag with two kind requests for clarification
>:-)...
I'm not sure what you are asking exactly, can you reformulate? Or
start new threads for clarity.
-Bertrand
--
On 28/05/18 16:50, Emilian Bold wrote:
[...]
Apache OpenOffice has https://extensions.openoffice.org and
https://templates.openoffice.org but I don't know how it works out from a
hosting / licensing perspective.
Tried out that one. Some comments:
a) There are commercial products there:
ht
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:11 PM Emilian Bold
wrote:
> I think C++ is much more important.
>
+1. *That* contrib will get handled is more important than that it happen
immediately (nice as that would be).
-Tim
I think C++ is much more important.
--emi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 25 July 2018 3:17 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Tim Boudreau niftin...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > Resurrecting this thread, since Tim Boudreau recently Mavenized the
> > > contrib rep
Hi Tim,
Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2018, 12:06 -0400 schrieb Tim Boudreau:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:34 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
> > PS: Just for the record, Oracle doesn't relicense anything at all
> > to
> > Apache. Instead, Oracle donates code to Apache, and we together,
> > here in
> >
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Tim Boudreau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:34 AM Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
> > PS: Just for the record, Oracle doesn't relicense anything at all to
> > Apache. Instead, Oracle donates code to Apache, and we together, here in
> > Apache NetBeans community,
I was thinking of the BSD ports tree.
Some plugins are closed-source but a whole lot of them are open-source.
There is no need the Plugin Portal to be a binary-only repository, we could
indeed just build stuff ourselves.
It doesn't need any fancy GitHub hooks, just a nightly cron job every now
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:34 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> PS: Just for the record, Oracle doesn't relicense anything at all to
> Apache. Instead, Oracle donates code to Apache, and we together, here in
> Apache NetBeans community, do the relicensing.
Great. So what will it take to make that ha
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Tim Boudreau wrote:
> >
> > Resurrecting this thread, since Tim Boudreau recently Mavenized the
> > contrib repo:
> >
> > https://github.com/timboudreau/netbeans-contrib
>
>
> I sent a note to this list about that on Monday, but got no response at
> all. Wonderi
PS: Just for the record, Oracle doesn't relicense anything at all to
Apache. Instead, Oracle donates code to Apache, and we together, here in
Apache NetBeans community, do the relicensing.
Gj
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On W
>
> Resurrecting this thread, since Tim Boudreau recently Mavenized the
> contrib repo:
>
> https://github.com/timboudreau/netbeans-contrib
I sent a note to this list about that on Monday, but got no response at
all. Wondering if it went into a black hole, or nobody cares :-)
> The Mavenizatio
There are a few known unknowns (and also unknown unknowns) in this area.
Firstly, what we know is the the Plugin Portal itself (i.e., the
application at plugins.netbeans.org) is going to be part of the 3rd
donation, i.e., the sources of the application have been audited and will
be donated to Apac
Resurrecting this thread, since Tim Boudreau recently Mavenized the
contrib repo:
https://github.com/timboudreau/netbeans-contrib
The Mavenization is certainly welcome (to me at least!) but someone
needs to officially decide what to *do* with all that stuff. Probably
all the live modules or logic
I think those things get dated quickly. People tend to like to have recognition
IMO, and is why to me the plugin portal grew, and contrib faded off. It would
also mean folks putting code there have to keep it up, and we have to rely on
them to do so, and they have to be all in on the Apache proc
Hi,
On Mon, 28 May 2018, 19:02 Wade Chandler, wrote:
> I think for the plugin portal, we could have a real simple registration
> scheme that is a repository that has a particular structure for a publisher
> with YAML files and images in it for plugin registration, and have a static
> site genera
On May 28, 2018, at 10:50 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
>
> I don't think under Apache we will be able to have a NetBeans-endorsed
> collection of 3rd party plugins.
>
> Clearly we won't be able to host them, but I'm not ever certain we could
> attach the NetBeans (and Apache) brand to a repository
I don't think under Apache we will be able to have a NetBeans-endorsed
collection of 3rd party plugins.
Clearly we won't be able to host them, but I'm not ever certain we could attach
the NetBeans (and Apache) brand to a repository of code we don't really control
or oversee much.
I believe we
I like the idea. Good plan.
Gj
On Monday, May 28, 2018, Christian Lenz wrote:
> Hey Devs,
>
> long time ago, there was mail thread (private) with Geertjan and a guy who
> created an „organization“ on GitHub for NetBeans Plugins, where I wanted to
> join and added all of my plugins to this repo,
Hey Devs,
long time ago, there was mail thread (private) with Geertjan and a guy who
created an „organization“ on GitHub for NetBeans Plugins, where I wanted to
join and added all of my plugins to this repo, to have it under a global,
public (official) repo for NetBeans. I don’t know what happe
21 matches
Mail list logo