Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Emilian Bold
s.org/binaries until it > goes down. Later on we can switch to http://netbeans.osuosl.org/binaries/ > (and perhaps also add a new folder just for new binaries, perhaps > http://netbeans.osuosl.org/apache-binaries/ or something). > > --emi > >> > Original Message -

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Antonio Vieiro
tbeans.osuosl.org/apache-binaries/ or > something). > > --emi > >> ---- Original Message >> Subject: Do we want multiple download servers >> Local Time: November 1, 2017 11:29 AM >> UTC Time: November 1, 2017 9:29 AM >> From: anto...@vieiro.

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Ate Douma
On 2017-11-01 17:29, Matthias Bläsing wrote: Hey, the big question - are there alternatives? How well does git cope with binaries and are there experiences with big repositories? The JNA project decided, that holding the released binaries in the git history would be a good idea. The library i

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Matthias Bläsing
Hey, the big question - are there alternatives? How well does git cope with binaries and are there experiences with big repositories? The JNA project decided, that holding the released binaries in the git history would be a good idea. The library itself is a few megabytes, the repository currentl

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > ...Since Apache does provide "convenience" binaries, ie. it does serve > dependencies, > how is it suddenly strange to have a place to store only the dependencies?... It's different if those binaries are from Apache projects or third parties.

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Emilian Bold
Original Message >Subject: Re: Do we want multiple download servers >Local Time: November 1, 2017 4:01 PM >UTC Time: November 1, 2017 2:01 PM >From: bdelacre...@apache.org >To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > >On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Emilian Bold emilian

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > ...is there any reason INFRA could not provide us a basic FTP account to > carry on http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries under Apache?... It depends on the cost, and hosting third-party binaries that we do not control might be a problem. But mayb

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Emilian Bold
ust a way to keep the git repo size under control. Because alternatively we could just commit 3rd party JARs, considering they *are* an IP cleared project dependency. --emi > Original Message >Subject: Re: Do we want multiple download servers >Local Time: November 1, 201

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > ...In the future http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries might be going away, but we > still have http://netbeans.osuosl.org/binaries/ > which is under my control... Note that any such resources should be put under control of the NetBeans PPMC,

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Emilian Bold
hg.netbeans.org/binaries until it goes down. Later on we can switch to http://netbeans.osuosl.org/binaries/ (and perhaps also add a new folder just for new binaries, perhaps  http://netbeans.osuosl.org/apache-binaries/ or something). --emi > Original Message -------- >Subject: Do we w

Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Antonio
Hi all, PROBLEM: The mylyn binaries are not available in Maven central. Nor in any other Maven repository. SOLUTION: We could use the eclipse downloads system, with automatic mirror selection, with [1]. So, for instance, to download the jar file org.eclipse.mylyn.tasks.core_3.17.0.v20150