Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Joe Witt
+1 (binding) - Release this package as nifi-0.3.0 On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Corey Flowers wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 15, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Rick Braddy wrote: >> >> +1 Release this package as nifi-0.3.0 >> >> - KEYS file in

Re: Ways to migrate to 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Rick Braddy
Thanks Bryan. That's easy! Rick > On Sep 15, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Bryan Bende wrote: > > Rick, > > You should be able to move the conf/flow.xml.gz from your snapshot > install to your new 0.3.0 conf directory. > > -Bryan > >> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015, Rick Braddy wrote: >> >> How can

Re: Ways to migrate to 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Bryan Bende
Rick, You should be able to move the conf/flow.xml.gz from your snapshot install to your new 0.3.0 conf directory. -Bryan On Tuesday, September 15, 2015, Rick Braddy wrote: > How can I migrate prior flow graph from 0.3.0-SNAPSHOT to the new 0.3.0 > tree? > > Rick > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Corey Flowers
+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 15, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Rick Braddy wrote: > > +1 Release this package as nifi-0.3.0 > > - KEYS file in source package only contains 4 signers, official release dist > has 6 signers: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/re

Ways to migrate to 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Rick Braddy
How can I migrate prior flow graph from 0.3.0-SNAPSHOT to the new 0.3.0 tree? Rick

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Rick Braddy
+1 Release this package as nifi-0.3.0 - KEYS file in source package only contains 4 signers, official release dist has 6 signers: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/nifi/KEYS (looks like Aldrin and Mark Payne were added to release keys but mi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Brandon DeVries
To copy and paste from Mark: Downloaded source, verified checksums and that the key/signature was valid. Was able to build with contrib-check without any problems. README/LICENSE/NOTICE all look good. Application runs without any problems. +1 (binding) - Release this package as nifi-0.3.0 Bran

Re: Helper for folks interested in verifying the 0.3.0 release

2015-09-15 Thread Matt Gilman
In the 3rd to last step, the DISCLAIMER file will not be present. That was a requirement for incubating projects which we were when we made the release that I copied these notes from. :) Matt On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Matt Gilman wrote: > The following guidance should help anyone intere

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Joe Percivall
Whops that +1 should have been not binding. - - - - - - Joseph Percivall linkedin.com/in/Percivall e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 12:08 PM, Joe Percivall wrote: Checked the keys, signature and verified the checksums.Valid README/LICENSE/NOTICE.Built with mvn cl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Joe Percivall
Checked the keys, signature and verified the checksums.Valid README/LICENSE/NOTICE.Built with mvn clean install -Pcontrib-check.Did a test dataflow and template, worked as epected. [+1] (binding) - - - - - - Joseph Percivalllinkedin.com/in/Percivalle: joeperciv...@yahoo.com On Tuesday, S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Bryan Bende
Signature and checksums look good Build passes with contrib-check README/LICENSE/NOTICE all look good Test dataflows perform as expexted +1 (binding) - Release this package as nifi-0.3.0 On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Mark Payne wrote: > Downloaded source, verified checksums and that the key

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.3.0

2015-09-15 Thread Mark Payne
Downloaded source, verified checksums and that the key/signature was valid. Was able to build with contrib-check without any problems. README/LICENSE/NOTICE all look good. Application runs without any problems. +1 (binding) - Release this package as nifi-0.3.0 Thanks -Mark > On Sep 14, 2015,