Github user jvwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/239
It appears that my errors were caused by memory constraints on the KPL.
With a larger EC2 instance, I was able to run at the provisioned throughput
threshold without the KPL process crashing. The
NiFi 0.7.0 presently has 24 open tickets [1].
I moved/closed those that appeared obvious to move out for now.
However, for those that remain they seem to be in active review state
and just needing some final review/feedback.
If you have tickets in here that you contributed or are reviewing
Github user brosander commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/492#discussion_r66007647
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-evtx-bundle/nifi-evtx-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/evtx/ParseEvtx.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+/*
Github user brosander commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/492#discussion_r66007547
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-evtx-bundle/nifi-evtx-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/evtx/ParseEvtx.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+/*
Github user brosander commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/492#discussion_r66007477
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-evtx-bundle/nifi-evtx-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/evtx/ParseEvtx.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+/*
Github user brosander commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/492#discussion_r66007396
--- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-evtx-bundle/nifi-evtx-processors/pom.xml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+
+
+http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
Github user jvwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/239
The suggested use of `name` and `displayName` on PropertyDescriptors has
been shared around a lot the last few days. You can read the [backstory
Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/492#discussion_r66000949
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-evtx-bundle/nifi-evtx-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/evtx/ParseEvtx.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
+/*
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65967740
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user jjmeyer0 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65942750
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user jjmeyer0 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65942690
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/324
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JPercivall commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/324
Looks good +1
Will merge into master and 0.x
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/487
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/487
Agree. Merging...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/495
+1 LGTM, built and ran the tests, also ran with a NiFi flow, verified the
attributes with empty segment components are displayed correctly.
Mind squashing your commits? Also I was having
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/495
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user atilcock opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/500
NIFI 1922
NIFI-1922 : Added dependencies for HDInsight wasb file format.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/atilcock/nifi
Brig,
Nothing is currently on the roadmap for a specific release, but there are
two issues that have some activity on JIRA and a working PR.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1922
Please feel free to add on with any additional details or cases that are
not included.
On Wed, May 25,
I used to have similar problems too, but after using "long path tool"
everything was solved. Try this software and you would be glad you did.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-nifi-developer-list.39713.n7.nabble.com/NiFi-Filenames-too-long-tp1096p11087.html
Sent from the Apache
Github user thadguidry commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/494
@olegz sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/499
NIFI-1052: Added "Ghost" Processors, Reporting Tasks, Controller Services
If we try to create a component for which the NAR is missing, we previously
would throw an Exception that would result in
GitHub user mattyb149 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/498
NIFI-1973 Allow ExecuteSQL to use flow file content as SQL query
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mattyb149/nifi NIFI-1973
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/468
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/468
merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/324
@JPercivall comments are addressed, so please take a look
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/494
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/494
Merging.
@thadguidry for the future, please raise JIRA prior to submitting PR
(regardless how small/trivial the issue may be)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/487
@pvillard31gave it some time and it looks like with regard to testing this
one will be one of those exceptions. In other words there is no easy way to
reliably write a test case to validate that this
Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/423
Closing this PR since I've submitted updated version #497
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ijokarumawak closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/423
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user ijokarumawak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/497
NIFI-1857: HTTPS Site-to-Site
Hi,
I've squashed #423 with the latest master, to add proxy auth and better
connection management. However, I haven't done tests with the latest clustering
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/397
True, and I did the same ('brew install tesseract') and got this
```
Trying a mirror...
==> Downloading
ftp://ftp.simplesystems.org/pub/libpng/png/src/libpng16/libpng-1.6.17.tar.xz
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65879551
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/EventAttributes.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65878804
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65878313
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/493#discussion_r65878170
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hadoop-bundle/nifi-hdfs-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hadoop/inotify/GetHDFSEvents.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/397
Ok, while all is good on Windows I can't seem to have any success building
those _.so_ files on OSx. Normally I would not worry about it that much but
given that Tesseract distribution includes DLLs
Github user olegz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/487
Well, while you can simulate the server behavior by changing SSH server
configs locally, indeed it would be impossible to ensure consistency on all
machines where build may be running. So the only thing
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/486
+1 @mattyb149
merged in master and 0.x
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/486
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/487
@olegz
Just to be sure before merging in: do you plan to add a unit test?
My guess is that it is not possible to simulate this server-side behavior,
but I want to confirm.
---
If your
42 matches
Mail list logo
