This email list is usually helpful. Can you provide some more detail about
the flow you are building?
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 8:10 AM, YuNing wrote:
>
> it realy helps me, thanks James. can you give some tips on how can i
> get more specific document about how to use a
+1, non-binding
- Verified hashes
- Full build with contrib-check passes
- Was able to run nifi server and send flow files to remote input port over s2s
protocol. Web UI and API working as expected.
Platform:
Apache Maven 3.5.0 (ff8f5e7444045639af65f6095c62210b5713f426;
+1 (non-binding).
Upgraded to 1.4.0, openJDK 1.8.0_102, RHEL. No issues.
-Original Message-
From: Joey Frazee [mailto:joey.fra...@icloud.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 3:50 AM
To: dev@nifi.apache.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.4.0 (RC2)
+1 (non-binding)
-
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified checksums and signature
- Successfully built and ran tests on OSX (Oracle 1.8.0_131), Amazon Linux
(Oracle 1.8.0_131), and Docker maven:latest (OpenJDK 1.8.0_141)
- Built RPM with `mvn -T 2.0C clean install -Prpm,generateArchives -DskipTests`
and tested install
-
+1 (non-binding)
Built on CentOS 7, upgraded an existing 1.3.0 cluster, ran a complex flow
with self-RPGs, reporting tasks, and controller services. All looks good!
The Avro viewer is especially nice, and the double-click feature already
feels natural. Great work!
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 4:41
+1 (binding)
Built on OSX 10.12.5 and Windows 8.1, and ran very simple flows on OSX,
Windows 8.1 and Windows 10. When building on Windows 8.1, ran into previous
test failures and a couple new ones found here[1]. As stated before, not
important enough to downvote the release.
Also one thing to
it realy helps me, thanks James. can you give some tips on how can i get
more specific document about how to use a processor, as the doc on nifi-website
is very simple.
Best Regards
YuNing
From: James Wing
Date: 2017-10-01 00:18
To: NiFi Dev List
Subject: Re: dose nifi suport Regular
+1 (binding)
Did all the normal release validation/L/sigs/etc..
Did a bunch of different tests largely focused on high performance and
stability. Things look really good.
I did run into a test failure which I've narrowed down to the latest
JRE/JDK version. Details