Issue securing nifi with ca-server.

Hello! My names Henk. I'm a web developer working on getting a nifi instance setup for some integrations. Long story short, I setup this nifi deployment configuration back when 1.5.0 was the latest version. Now that its 1.6.0 everything works! ...except one thing. I'm currently using

Re: Travis is broken?

I just built one of my branches in my personal travis, and all 3 jobs completed. On June 4, 2018 at 15:39:48, Mike Thomsen (mikerthom...@gmail.com) wrote: It says it cannot find repo apache/nifi. Anyone know what's happening?

Re: Travis is broken?

No caches. On June 4, 2018 at 16:37:42, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: I just built one of my branches in my personal travis, and all 3 jobs completed. On June 4, 2018 at 15:39:48, Mike Thomsen (mikerthom...@gmail.com) wrote: It says it cannot find repo apache/nifi. Anyone know

Re: [EXT] Re: URL configuration for the remote process group in Nifi 1.3

Mark Want some more clarity. Let me see if I understand this. Just to be clear we are using RPG purely for load balancing on the same cluster. Step 1: When it initially connects to Node1, it would fetch all the cluster details i.e it would know all the nodes that exist in my cluster which are

Travis is broken?

It says it cannot find repo apache/nifi. Anyone know what's happening?

Re: oAuth for API stood up on nifi

Thanks Bryan. On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Bryan Bende wrote: > Hello, > > Processors can't leverage NiFi's internal authentication and > authorization mechanisms. > > For HandleHttpRequest it supports two-way TLS for client authentication. > > -Bryan > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM,

Re: oAuth for API stood up on nifi

Hello, Processors can't leverage NiFi's internal authentication and authorization mechanisms. For HandleHttpRequest it supports two-way TLS for client authentication. -Bryan On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Anil Rai wrote: > Team, for invoking the nifi API's on a secured cluster, we have to

oAuth for API stood up on nifi

Team, for invoking the nifi API's on a secured cluster, we have to get the token and then invoke. Now if I stand up a new API via HandleHttpRequest processor, is there a way to use the inbuilt oAuth to access this API? Regards Anil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.5.0

Thanks for the feedback Koji. I removed the references to MD5 from the MiNiFi release wiki[1] so next time we will avoid supplying the MD5 checksum. [1] - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=70254849 On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Koji Kawamura wrote: > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.5.0

+1 (binding) - Verified hashes - Build and unit tests succeeded - Run simple flows to send data from MiNiFi CPP to NiFi - on Mac OS 10.13.4 I have a feedback on the release procedure. Apache Release distribution policy has following: "SHOULD NOT supply a MD5 checksum file (because MD5 is too

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.5.0

Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to announce that the 0.5.0 release of Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ passes with 4 +1 (binding) votes 1 +1 (non-binding) votes 0 0 votes 0 -1 (binding) votes 0 -1 (non-binding) votes Thanks to all who helped make this release possible. Here is the PMC vote

Re: KerberosProperties.validatePrincipalAndKeytab Error ?

Ok that makes sinn. It was really confusing because all other processors when they say Supports language expression it works on the incoming flow files. Thanks for the heads up. Jorge Machado > On 4 Jun 2018, at 14:34, Mark Payne wrote: > > Jorge, > > These properties do support Expression

Re: KerberosProperties.validatePrincipalAndKeytab Error ?

Jorge, These properties do support Expression Language. However, they do not support evaluating FlowFile Attributes, only values from the Variable Registry. So this is going to be invalid unless you define a variable in the variable registry for both the Principal and the Keytab.

Re: NIFI URL

Do you already have something running that is listening on 8080? On June 3, 2018 at 13:44:09, Dev Lamani (ddlaman...@gmail.com) wrote: Dear Team, I need urgent help on Apache NIFI. 1. I could able to install NIFI-1.3.0 2. Started the NIFI services 3. Tried Invoking NIFI UI : localhost:8080

Re: KerberosProperties.validatePrincipalAndKeytab Error ?

Sivaprasanna, Yes I have that property set, the Unit test is failing IMHO it should not. Jorge Machado Best Regards > On 4 Jun 2018, at 12:09, Sivaprasanna wrote: > > Jorge, > > Both 'Kerberos Principal' abd 'Kerberos Keytab' support NiFi expression > language so ${principal} and

Re: KerberosProperties.validatePrincipalAndKeytab Error ?

Jorge, Both 'Kerberos Principal' abd 'Kerberos Keytab' support NiFi expression language so ${principal} and ${keytab} is valid here. Can you check if the property "nifi.kerberos.krb5.file" is set in nifi.properties file? Looks like this has to be set according to the description of those

Re: Disable all Remote Processors

Hi Pierre, sorry, for the late response. Yes that is the idea. In our case we have a lot of RPG and is kind of boring the need to go trough every single one and click disable Thanks for the response any way. > On 15 May 2018, at 11:50, Pierre Villard wrote: > > Hi Jorge, > > I'm not