Re: [DISCUSS] Tar + Gzip vs. Zip

It's a great idea, Andy, I strongly support just one format. I think Zip is a good choice. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:16 AM Otto Fowler wrote: > I end up using zip all the time. zip +1 > > > On June 26, 2018 at 13:30:33, Tony Kurc (tk...@apache.org) wrote: > > My preference is zip. > > On

Re: Help: I want to be a contributor to NiFi, but encountered two problems

Hello, You might want to start here: https://community.hortonworks.com/articles/106931/nifi-debugging-tutorial.html It gives a good overview of logging and also attaching a debugger from IntelliJ idea. Regards, Chris On June 26, 2018 at 9:34:51 PM, run_psw (run_...@aliyun.com.invalid) wrote:

Help: I want to be a contributor to NiFi, but encountered two problems

Hi I am a data develper from china , and i am new to NiFi. When I first experienced NiFi, It makes me especially excited. So I want to be a contributor. I was Reference the website that gave by NiFi . but it isn't work.and i can find where

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NiFi 1.7.0 release

Hello The Apache NiFi team would like to announce the release of Apache NiFi 1.7.0. Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. Apache NiFi was made for dataflow. It supports highly configurable directed graphs of data routing, transformation,

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.5.0

Hello, I am pleased to call this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi MiNiFi minifi-0.5.0. The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenifi-1129/

Re: NiFi (UNCLASSIFIED)

Justin, The 4.x version you're referencing is specific to the organization you work for. I would direct questions specific to this version to your organization's internal chatrooms / DLs. If you need further guidance, please let me know. Brandon On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:49 PM Cetron, Justin

NiFi (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED Good Afternoon, I had a question in regards to NiFi. I recently have been tasked with upgrading the NiFi we run, however, in looking at the versions I have vs. what I have seen on the nifi.apache.org site, are there two different versions of the software? As what

Re: [DISCUSS] Tar + Gzip vs. Zip

I end up using zip all the time. zip +1 On June 26, 2018 at 13:30:33, Tony Kurc (tk...@apache.org) wrote: My preference is zip. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 9:21 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > > On 6/25/18 11:34 PM, Andy LoPresto wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I do not want to start a long-running

Re: [DISCUSS] Tar + Gzip vs. Zip

My preference is zip. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 9:21 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > > On 6/25/18 11:34 PM, Andy LoPresto wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I do not want to start a long-running argument or entrenched battle. > > However, having just performed the RM duties for the latest release, I > > believe

[PROPOSAL] Reference Utility Script to help automate some of RC validation in Release Process

I would like to propose the the Release Process , specifically the section: *RM sends the following helper email to the NiFi Developers Mailing List* be changed to include a link to, as well as a description of valid use of the script referenced in PR

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.5.0

Ok sure thing I will review those now. I will let you know if I find anything. If not I'll merge them into master and kick off the release process. Thanks, Jeremy Dyer On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote: > Yeah, I believe we are down to just two issues listed here to be

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.5.0

Yeah, I believe we are down to just two issues listed here to be reviewed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-459?jql=project%20%3D%20MINIFI%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.5.0 Otherwise, it

Preliminary work on SCP and SSH processors

I’ve been working on NIFI-539 and NIFI-3698, adding support for SSH based processors like SCP and an Execute SSH. I’ve submitted a PR, but it definitely needs some work still. Would appreciate some feedback on the approaches. Unlike most of my code changes, this one should be easy for most

Re: [DISCUSS] Tar + Gzip vs. Zip

As a user I always download the zip file. Echoing Mike's reply, I work across Linux, Windows, and OSX and my mouse always goes toward the zip. I've never run into any file permission/attribute issues with the zip distribution. Everything that should be executable always has been. So if you axed

Re: [DISCUSS] Tar + Gzip vs. Zip

I would lean toward Zip because it is the format that is supported by Windows, macOS and Linux out of the box. I think the ease of use for Windows users is particularly important. On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:34 PM Andy LoPresto wrote: > Hi folks, > > I do not want to start a long-running