Hey Mike,
I recall looking at Mark's PR in May and believe it fit the bill for a
processor looking to live ingest data into Accumulo. Just be cautious of
minor and major compaction storms that may cause backpressure. Bulk load is
also possible -- and probably even easier with the record-oriented
David,
Any progress? Been flirting with the idea of looking at Accumulo and wanted
to sync up.
Thanks,
Mike
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 5:06 PM DAVID SMITH
wrote:
> Ok, thanks I will keep that in mind when I (or whoever on my team writes
> these) get to a point where we would like a review before
MQTT can function in its own right outside of Site to Site and MiNiFi could
support that using processors.
A bit of time ago, I made NIFI-1820 [1] which can be notionally summed up
as being "extend Site to Site with caveats depending on backing protocol."
Conceptually, I like what this could provi
I think the general capability you are referring to is called
"dependent properties" and it has not yet been implemented [1]. To
some extent you can do this programmatically by overriding
customValidate() or onPropertyModified() for example, and updating the
list of PropertyDescriptors that are re
How could i do ?
how to hide or show someone nifi property when i change drop-down box value ?
Yeah I think the HTTP approach is fine for my use case where the number of
"satellites" is limited.
However, we can extend this discussion to the IoT use case where satellites
are MiNiFi agents and where the number of agents is thousands or more. In
that case the HTTP approach won't scale and I do
