Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.7.0

+1 binding * Verified the artifact signatures and digests (I don’t think the MD5 and SHA1 digests need to be published anymore). * Verified the build process and contrib check. * Verified the LICENSE and NOTICE files. * Deployed a NiFi Registry 0.7.0 instance and connected to it with NiFi 1.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.7.0

+1 (non-binding) - Verified checksums, signatures, and commit hash - Verified README, LICENSE & NOTICE - Verified full clean build & contrib check on Java 8 - Able to create buckets and versioned flows on non-secure NiFi/Registry Thanks, Margot > On Jul 15, 2020, at 8:31 AM, Bryan Bende wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.7.0

+1 non-binding. Verified full clean build with contrib check on Java 8, commit tag and hash. diffed sources and looked good. License + Notice looked good. Ran local docker image and created a few buckets on a non-secure nifi/registry. All looks good. On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:36 PM Joe Witt wr

Re: [discuss]Release MiNiFi-CPP 0.8.0

Hi, Reflecting to an ongoing chat conversation about intermediate releases: I agree with not rushing 1.0, but having multiple releases with big API changes after 0.8 would be probably difficult for the user base to adopt to. A problematic example: - We make a decision on which namespace a par