Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi 2.0 Release Goals

2021-07-24 Thread David Handermann
Thanks for pointing out the standard NAR bundles, Mark. There are a number of components in the standard NAR bundles with particular dependencies that would make more sense in separate NARs. Reorganizing the standard NAR to components with limited dependencies and wide applicability would

Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi 2.0 Release Goals

2021-07-24 Thread Mark Payne
There’s also some code that exists in order to maintain backward compatibility in the repositories. I would very much like the repositories to contain no unnecessary code. And swap file format supports really old formats. And the old impls of the repositories themselves, like PersistentProvRepo

Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi 2.0 Release Goals

2021-07-24 Thread Mike Thomsen
Russell, AFAICT from looking at Elastic's repos, the low level REST client is still fine. https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/blob/e5518e07f13701e3bb3dcc6842b9023966752497/client/rest/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/client/RestClient.java Our Elasticsearch support is spread over two NARs