Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Nifi in Kubernetes environment

Thank you @Michael Moser for the quick inputs, we will go through the link. Regards, Dharani Tirumanyam. From: Michael Moser Date: Monday, 6 November 2023 at 10:15 PM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Cc: Pulimi, Satish , Shankarprasad, Raghuveera , Tirumanyam, Dharani

Re: Removing JRuby?

While I do like the ExecuteScript processors as they are great at digging you out of a hole. The performance of them isn't that great. That being said I would ve careful about dropping Lua support as there is a growing list of software that supports end user/administrator extensions via Lua for

Re: Nifi in Kubernetes environment

There are many ways to run Apache NiFi in containers and Kubernetes. Have a look at NiFiKop, a kubernetes operator for Apache NiFi [1]. Note that it is a separate open-source project from Apache NiFi itself. [1] - https://github.com/konpyutaika/nifikop Regards, -- Mike On Mon, Nov 6, 2023

Re: Removing JRuby?

I believe it is because in both ExecuteScript and ExecuteGroovyScript you can do "regular" groovy, but EGS has extra built-ins such as easy access to controller services, Groovy SQL stuff, etc, and we could keep building it out. But IMO we'd have to port the rest of the scripted components

Nifi in Kubernetes environment

Hi Nifi Team, I would like to know about how NIFI behaves in Kubernetes as we are moving to Kubernetes now, it would be very helpful if there is any proper documentation regarding how NIFI works in Kubernetes environment and how to establish site-to-site communication using NIFI in Kubernetes

NiFi SSO Login Using OIDC

Dear NiFi Developer Team, I want to enable SSO login in NiFi version 1.4 in my Compute Engine in GCP using OIDC. I want to allowed all user from my Azure Active Directory group that i have made before to be able to login to NiFi using their account as registered. But i can't seem to make it

Re: Removing JRuby?

If we deprecate ExecuteScript, I think we need to have groovyx be ready to function as a drop-in replacement if it's not there already. On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 9:21 PM Matt Burgess wrote: > IIRC the removal of these engines was mostly due to lack of use or at > least the perception thereof. If