Hey Marton,
I strongly support this, and I also agree with Gábor that JNI should
be dropped as well.
Minifi java is in a really good shape so if anybody wants to use the
java processors I can't see a reason why would they bother with the
C++ agent with JNI since the whole point of the C++ agent go
Hi Marton,
I also support removing all of these unused extensions, thanks for
starting the discussion about this!
I think we could also discuss if JNI extension could be removed. It's
a special extension for running Java processors in MiNiFi C++, but as
MiNiFi Java is also available for this purp
Marton,
Thanks for bringing this up, I'm +1, too!
Cheers,
Arpad
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 5:05 PM Joe Witt wrote:
> Marton
>
> I strongly support this. The path needs to be maintainable and keeping
> things around that dont get the love create many challenges.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024
Marton
I strongly support this. The path needs to be maintainable and keeping
things around that dont get the love create many challenges.
Thanks
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 7:48 AM Marton Szasz wrote:
> Hi community,
>
> We're considering to drop certain features from MiNiFi C++ that seem to
> be
Hi community,
We're considering to drop certain features from MiNiFi C++ that seem to
be unused, and not worth maintaining. If you would like to keep some of
them, please share your opinion and your use case for them!
To be removed:
1. CoAP C2: not used anywhere as far as I'm aware, and not w
