Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/1
This project structure is a work in progress to begin development and is
expected to continue evolving as the project matures, but this should give
enough for others to start collaborating
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/1
NIFIREG-1 Initial project structure for NiFi Registry
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/bbende/nifi-registry NIFIREG-1
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/608
NIFI-2171 Removing list of groups from User
- Making FileAuthorizer not update the resource or action when updating an
AccessPolicy
- Adding corresponding READ policies during initial seeding and
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/590
NIFI-2138 Making AccessPolicy have a single RequestAction
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/bbende/nifi NIFI-2138
Alternatively you
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/588
NIFI-2127 Adding support for managing the user-group relationship froâ¦
â¦m the Group side
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/bbende
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/581
NIFI-1916 Improvements to FileAuthorizer to not parse flow when unnceâ¦
â¦ssary and to recreate missing authorizations.xml
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/579
+1 verified build passes contrib-check and was able to get into a secured
NiFi instance
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/579
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/578
NIFI-2113 Updating storm dependency to 1.0.1 and fixing package names
This should only be merged to NiFi master, we will leave 0.x using storm
0.10.x.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/574
NIFI-1733 [REVIEW ONLY] Adding a Ranger implementation of NiFi's Authorizer
API
This PR is not meant to be merged yet, as it currently is based on a
SNAPSHOT dependency of Ranger, but wanted t
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/567
+1 looks good, verified full build passes with contrib-check and the new
integration test pass, ran the app a bit and verified basic functionality
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/567
Will start reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/566
NIFI-2061 Ensure nodes in a cluster use consistent authorizations
- Added methods to AbstractPolicyBasedAuthorizer to generate and inherit a
fingerprint
- Updated StandardFlowSynchronizer to
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68075384
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68061144
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/543#discussion_r67779821
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PutTCP.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,290
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/543
Looks good to me +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/513
@rtempleton just merged this work as part of PR 542, thanks for the
contribution!
can we close this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/542#discussion_r67718748
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hbase-bundle/nifi-hbase-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/hbase/PutHBaseJSON.java
---
@@ -89,6 +89,25
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/543#discussion_r67700294
--- Diff:
nifi-commons/nifi-processor-utilities/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/util/put/AbstractPutEventProcessor.java
---
@@ -126,8 +127,9
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/543#discussion_r67698814
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PutTCP.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,270
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/543#discussion_r67698292
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PutTCP.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,270
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/543#discussion_r67696982
--- Diff:
nifi-commons/nifi-processor-utilities/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/util/put/AbstractPutEventProcessor.java
---
@@ -119,7 +119,24
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/543#discussion_r67697377
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PutTCP.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,270
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/543
I think the intent behind this processor was to send data over a
connection, but not to read anything back. Essentially doing what PutSyslog and
PutSplunk are doing when in TCP mode.
That
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/513
@rtempleton please take a look at https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/542
I've incorporated your work there with some additional changes which I
explained in the PR description. Let me kn
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/542
NIFI-1895 for 0.x
This pull request contains @rtempleton 's work from PR 513, but rebased for
the 0.x branch.
In addition, there is another commit by me which adds a new proper
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/513
Reviewing and going to merge into 0.x and master if all looks good...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/518
+1 looks good, verified a full build with contrib-check passes locally
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/535
+1 looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/524
+1 looks good, verified all issues fixed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/507
@mcgilman good call, I pushed a new commit that addresses your comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/513
Thats a great point about leveraging any changes they make to the Bytes
class... I'm now thinking, what if we added simple methods to the
HBaseClientService interface [1] that wrapped the cal
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/509
@ijokarumawak you can close this when you get a chance since it has been
merged, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/513
Ryan, thanks for submitting this PR!
Is it possible that we could remove the dependency on hbase-client here?
The reason being is that the hbase processor bundle purposely didn&#
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/509
+1 looks good, will merge to 0.x... I am assuming this was only meant for
0.x and the same fix is in your other PR for http site-to-site
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/503
@ijokarumawak I merged to 0.x but GitHub doesn't auto-close from that
branch, can you close this PR when you have a chance? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/503
+1 good find, verified the yield duration is maintained across restarts,
will merge to 0.x
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/503
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/499
+1 code looks good, build passes, tested a missing processor, controller
service, and reporting task and the app still starts up, awesome stuff! Will
merge into master shortly.
---
If your project is
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/499
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/498
+1 This looks good, will merge to master and 0.x
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/507
NIFI-1804 Adding ability for FileAuthorizer to automatically convert â¦
â¦existing authorized-users.xml to new model
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/489
+1 full build passed contrib-check, ran the app and verified custom UIs
still work
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/473
@mcgilman updated the PR to address the thread-safety, a summary of the
changes...
- Created a single data structure to encapsulate all data structures used
by the FileAuthorizer so there can be a
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/482
+1 looks good, verified registration form no longer exists and access
denied page is presented instead
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/482
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483
Sorry that second line should have been something like:
`split = session.putAttribute(split, "split.parent.uuid", parentUUID);`
You wouldn't want to overwrite t
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483
@trixpan if you want to add the UUDI of the original FlowFile you would get
it from the attributes:
`String parentUuid =
originalFlowFile.getAttribute(CoreAttributes.UUID.key
Github user bbende commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/483
@joewitt @trixpan I think the provenance linkage should already be
happening automatically with the following line:
`FlowFile split = session.create(originalFlowFile);`
With that call
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/473
NIFI-1916 Updating FileAuthorizer to extend AbstractPolicyBasedAuthorâ¦
â¦izer and adding intial loading of data users, groups, and policies
- Implementing CRUD operations and unit tests for
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/457#issuecomment-221268368
Going to merge this in since Joe was a +1...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/457#issuecomment-221068355
@joewitt good idea regarding the error handling, i made the suggested
changes and and rebased so the commit should now reflect those changes
---
If your project is set up
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/452#issuecomment-221046683
@mcgilman @jtstorck @alopresto pushed two new commits, the first contains
minor changes to address some of Matt's comments, the second is an attempt at
what Matt sugg
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/452#discussion_r64076734
--- Diff:
nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/authorization/AccessPolicy.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/457
NIFI-1907 Moving lazy init of SSLContext...
to StandardSiteToSiteClientConfig rather than the builder.
Tested secure SiteToSite still working between two NiFi nodes, and now
example Storm
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/452#discussion_r63760082
--- Diff:
nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/authorization/AccessPolicy.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/452#discussion_r63759950
--- Diff:
nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/authorization/AccessPolicy.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/452#discussion_r63760205
--- Diff: nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/authorization/Group.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/452#issuecomment-220121052
@alopresto The intent was for the relationship to be bi-directional,
meaning you could add a user to a group by adding/updating a User with a new
group id in the set of
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/452
NIFI-1884 Defining API for Users, Groups, and Policies
This pull request introduces the concept of a MutableAuthorizer which is an
interface that extends the recently introduced Authorizer. A
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/436#issuecomment-219738116
Since @markap14 has already reviewed this and merged it into 0.x branch, I
am going to merge this into master myself so we don't lose track of this.
---
If your pr
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/448#issuecomment-219736438
+1 Full build passes with contrib-check, was able to create a flow with
controller services working as expected. Ran into an issue importing a template
with a controller
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/435#issuecomment-218813109
+1 Verified component level revisions working as expected, full build
passes with contrib-check
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/435#issuecomment-218805610
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/436#issuecomment-218766817
@markap14 here is the corresponding PR for merging the site-to-site
reporting bundle into master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/436
NIFI-1858 Adding site-to-site reporting bundle
PR for merging this into master.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/bbende/nifi NIFI
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/419#issuecomment-218765899
@markap14 thanks, going to close this PR and initiate a new one against
master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bbende closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/419
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/419#discussion_r62548156
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-site-to-site-reporting-bundle/nifi-site-to-site-reporting-task/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/reporting
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/419#discussion_r62505576
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-site-to-site-reporting-bundle/nifi-site-to-site-reporting-task/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/reporting
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/419
NIFI-1858 Adding SiteToSiteProvenanceReportingTask
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/bbende/nifi NIFI-1858
Alternatively you can
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/417#issuecomment-217541758
+1 Looks good, was able to run the app secured and unsecured to verify
basic functionality, and build passes contrib-check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#issuecomment-216595481
Latest changes look good, I am a +1 again :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#discussion_r61832445
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hive-bundle/nifi-hive-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hive/SelectHiveQL.java
---
@@ -52,15 +54,27
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#discussion_r61832456
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hive-bundle/nifi-hive-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hive/SelectHiveQL.java
---
@@ -52,15 +54,27
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#issuecomment-216246029
Latest commits look good, I am a +1 and going to merge to 0.x and master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/393#issuecomment-215872920
I'm a +1... reviewed and looks good, ran the application in secure and
un-secure modes to verify functionality, passes contrib-check.
---
If your project is set up f
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#discussion_r61614773
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hive-bundle/nifi-hive-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hive/PutHiveQL.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,322
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#discussion_r61502555
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hive-bundle/nifi-hive-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hive/ExecuteHiveQL.java
---
@@ -152,8 +152,23
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#issuecomment-215498279
Overall this looks great @mattyb149 ! I was able to get the processors
working against kerberized and non-kerberized Hive. I think if we address the
one or two minor
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#discussion_r61343688
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hive-bundle/nifi-hive-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hive/ExecuteHiveQL.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,178
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#discussion_r61316112
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hive-bundle/nifi-hive-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/hive/ExecuteHiveQL.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,178
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/384#discussion_r61317929
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hive-bundle/nifi-hive-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/hive/HiveJdbcCommon.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,272
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/374#issuecomment-213121166
Pulled down the latest and tested again, all looks good now, app seems to
function properly in standalone and clustered mode.
I'm a +1 to merge this.
---
If
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/374#issuecomment-213101837
I was testing a 2 node cluster locally and noticed that the part in the
toolbar that says Connected Nodes didn't show anything after it, but in the
cluster view it s
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/374#issuecomment-213080400
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/345#discussion_r60256873
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-kafka-bundle/nifi-kafka-pubsub-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/kafka/pubsub/AbstractKafkaProcessor.java
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/345#discussion_r60256134
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-kafka-bundle/nifi-kafka-pubsub-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/kafka/pubsub/ConsumeKafka.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/364#issuecomment-211945609
Looks good, verified the change fixes the problem with ports, will push to
master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/364#issuecomment-211941635
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/363#issuecomment-211937379
looks good, passes contrib-check, will push to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/363#issuecomment-211931551
Reviewing...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user bbende commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/361#issuecomment-211928987
@olegz new commit with the validation change and logger.isDebugEnabled()
changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/361#discussion_r60228292
--- Diff:
nifi-external/nifi-storm-spout/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/storm/NiFiBolt.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/361#discussion_r60227372
--- Diff:
nifi-external/nifi-storm-spout/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/storm/NiFiBolt.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/361#discussion_r60227347
--- Diff:
nifi-external/nifi-storm-spout/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/storm/NiFiBolt.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/361#discussion_r60227326
--- Diff:
nifi-external/nifi-storm-spout/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/storm/NiFiBolt.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user bbende commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/361#discussion_r60226578
--- Diff:
nifi-external/nifi-storm-spout/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/storm/NiFiBolt.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
GitHub user bbende opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/361
NIFI-1778 Adding NiFiBolt to write back to NiFi from Storm
- Adding example topology that creates a full loop between NiFi and Storm.
- Bumping Storm to 0.10.0
There is an example topology
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
