Github user jdye64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/397#discussion_r67618912
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ocr-bundle/nifi-ocr-processors/src/test/resources/tessdata/tessconfigs/nobatch
---
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+
--- End diff
Github user jdye64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/397
Olegz any luck getting your local install of Tesseract to work?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jdye64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/397
@olegz my initial intention was that the "TESS_DATA_PATH" and the
"TessdataDirectoryValidator" being a required PropertyDescriptor would catch
those instances where users tried t
Github user jdye64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/397#discussion_r64843410
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-ocr-bundle/nifi-ocr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/ocr/TesseractOCRProcessor.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,361
Github user jdye64 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/468#issuecomment-221889685
Nice catch Simon. Little things like that are hard to find.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
GitHub user jdye64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/397
NIFI-1815
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jdye64/nifi NIFI-1815
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch
Github user jdye64 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/340#issuecomment-214313062
@apiri that makes perfect sense to me. Not sure what your preference is but
feel free to make the changes yourself if that is easier or let me know if you
would like
Github user jdye64 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/377#issuecomment-213528810
It might make more sense to leave those sort of operations to a
ReportingTask however? Does anyone have any thoughts around that?
---
If your project is set up
Github user jdye64 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/377#issuecomment-213528547
@aperepel that isn't a bad idea. That takes a little more discussion around
how often we continue to post that bulletin if the threshold is constantly
exceeded, what
GitHub user jdye64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/377
NIFI-1805
Expose BackPressureObjectThreshold and BackPressureDataSizeThreshold to
ConnectionStatus
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
GitHub user jdye64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/340
NIFI-1747 add maven-war-plugin to create jar as part of the existing â¦
â¦nifi-web-api build process
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user jdye64 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/158#issuecomment-171674914
Taking Joe's feedback I merged the two processors InferAvroSchemaFromCSV
and InferAvroSchemaFromJSON into a single processor InferAvroSchema.
---
If your project is set
GitHub user jdye64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/159
NIFI-1360
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jdye64/nifi NIFI-1360
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch
Github user jdye64 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/159
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jdye64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/157
NIFI-1156
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jdye64/nifi NIFI-1356
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch
GitHub user jdye64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/158
NiFi-1356
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jdye64/nifi NIFI-1356
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch
Github user jdye64 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/157
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jdye64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/124
NIFI-1156: HTML Parsing Processors Bundle
NIFI-1156: HTML Parsing Processors Bundle. GetHTMLElement,
ModifyHTMLElement, and PutHTMLElement
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
GitHub user jdye64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/109
NiFi-1079
Create a new Attribute from the existing FlowFile attributes by taking
either all of the existing attributes or a user defined list. The
existing Attributes are converted to JSON
19 matches
Mail list logo