Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556
I took @joewitt's comment to mean keeping the combined bundle and
documenting that attributes are not stable and could change with version
upgrades, which will apply to both bundles if we break them
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556
Just pushed final cleanup, that should be it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556
To wrap this up, should I add the failure provenance now or will that be a
future change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68076407
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68073301
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68070698
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556
@JPercivall and @joewitt, I just pushed the updates. Have at it!
* Code review cleanup.
- Replace deprecated ProcessorLog with ComponentLog and deprecated
ObjectHolder
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556
I'm running contrib check and a functional test now.
Should be pushed shortly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/280
Yes, this should be closed. Done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jskora closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/280
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68044015
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/image/ExtractImageMetadataTest.java
---
@@ -37,7
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68042865
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68042751
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68042689
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68041847
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r68039891
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r67965881
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r67965763
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556#discussion_r67965642
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,311
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/556
I'm not sure why but only the main code commit,
236266c9e4ed89b4c78438f36408b5f6e0b0c488, applies to 1.0/master without
problems. The other pom commits do not.
It is easy enough to fix them
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252
Ok, I think I've resolved the problems. The Tika conflict was fixed by
udpating Tika and Metadata Extractor dependency versions and adjusting
ExtractImageMetadata for new attribute names in the newer
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252
Ironically, this boils down to a version dependency conflict between
ExtractMediaMetadata which uses Tika 1.7 which uses Drew Noakes'
Metadata-Extract 2.6.2 and the existing ExtractImageMetadata which
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252
So, the problems you had with the JPG file are two separate issues.
- The default `BodyContentHandler` passed to the parser can only handle
100,000 bytes, so any file larger than that produces
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67393537
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67387942
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67387964
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/TestExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67385461
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67384364
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67383325
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/458
Ok, I think that last commit covers the review feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/458#discussion_r67341980
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/DebugFlow.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/458#discussion_r67335539
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/DebugFlow.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/458#discussion_r67335284
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/DebugFlow.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,499
Github user jskora commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252
@JPercivall, I'll try to get this updated tomorrow morning. This was
originally done in February, but I'm hoping the rebase won't be too bad.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67218396
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67218355
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67218079
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#discussion_r67215325
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-media-bundle/nifi-media-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/media/ExtractMediaMetadata.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,276
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/458#discussion_r65487473
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/DebugFlow.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,414
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/458#discussion_r65487334
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/DebugFlow.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,414
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/458#discussion_r65486064
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/DebugFlow.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,414
Github user jskora closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430#issuecomment-222580134
This as it was replaced by [Pull Request
478](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/478).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/478
NIFI-1754 Rollback log messages should include the flowfile filename â¦
â¦and UUID to assist in flow management. Incorporates debug logging into
StandardProcessSession.rollback() to list Flowfile
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/244#issuecomment-221163835
This is really nice, it was great being able to just provide the AWS CLI
profile and have setting automatically picked up.
Great improvement, thanks James
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/244#issuecomment-220749583
I'm starting to review and test this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430#discussion_r63405577
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/FlowDebugger.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,414
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430#discussion_r63405091
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-core/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/repository/StandardProcessSession.java
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430#discussion_r63279086
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-framework-core/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/controller/repository/StandardProcessSession.java
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430#discussion_r63279016
--- Diff:
nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/ProcessSession.java ---
@@ -109,6 +109,19 @@
void rollback(boolean penalize
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430#discussion_r63277496
--- Diff:
nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/AbstractProcessor.java ---
@@ -21,13 +21,19 @@
public abstract class AbstractProcessor extends
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430#discussion_r63277482
--- Diff: nifi-api/pom.xml ---
@@ -21,5 +21,12 @@
0.7.0-SNAPSHOT
nifi-api
-jar
+jar
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/430
NIFI-1754 Rollback log messages should include the flowfile filename and
UUID
* Add optional functionality for the Processor framework to maintain a
count of flowfile rollbacks in a flowfile
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/322#issuecomment-213070365
@ckmcd this has been merged to the 1.0 and 0.x branches. Looks great and
works well.
I forgot to put "this closes" on the commit, could you please cl
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#issuecomment-211868734
@joewitt On [NIFI-1717|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1717] and
[NIFI-1718|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1718] Dmitry Goldenberg
and I discussed
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/238#issuecomment-211711893
I can, but it might not be until later this week.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Joe Witt <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> Anyone in a good
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/322#issuecomment-211107429
This looks pretty good, but in testing I came across 2 problems that need
to be addressed before it can be merged.
1. The example in the [expression language
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/344#issuecomment-208593602
Reviewing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/344#discussion_r59292187
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-kafka-bundle/nifi-kafka-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/kafka/KafkaPublisherTest.java
---
@@ -124,33 +112,9
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/280#discussion_r56322564
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/SplitText.java
---
@@ -134,6 +168,28
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/280#issuecomment-197388774
I think the issues are all covered now and tests have been expanded to get
all critical logic and edge cases.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#issuecomment-198427593
I don't love all the attribute names, I might have come up with a cleaner
taxonomy myself. But, letting Tika handle it leverages the work done on
another active Apache
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252#issuecomment-198408663
@joewitt, the attribute names are created by Tika and seem to be based on
the source file types. The core Tika module was already in the project and the
Tika parsers
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/280
NIFI-1118 Update SplitText Processor - add support for split size limits
and header line markers.
* Add "Maximum Fragment Size" property. A new split file will be created
if the
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/135#issuecomment-196847105
Cancelling this pull request, will followup with new PR for updated and
current source branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jskora closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/135
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/252
NIFI-615 - Create a processor to extract WAV file characteristics.
* Created new ExtractMediaMetadata processor using Apache Tika Detector and
Parser.
* Refactored nifi-image-bundle, nifi-image
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/238#discussion_r53674055
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-aws-bundle/nifi-aws-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/aws/s3/ListS3.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,230
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/243
NIFI-1545 Update AWS S3 IT tests for new proxy properties
Adjust integration tests ITDeleteS3Object, ITFetchS3Object, and
ITPutS3Object to account for AWS new proxy properties. Correct typo
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/209#discussion_r52362955
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-aws-bundle/nifi-aws-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/aws/AbstractAWSProcessor.java
---
@@ -161,6 +180,12
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/192#issuecomment-177583468
@joewitt
I've been trying to get the multipart upload in for a while, my preference
would be to incorporate the multipart as is and then update
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/192#issuecomment-177570291
Just pushed commit that
- cleans up property description,
- validates that upload still exists in S3 before resuming from local
state, and
- verifies local
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/147#issuecomment-176331346
I can also build master successfully now.
Interestingly, it downloaded the hive-serde jar file from the Cloudera
repository. Not sure why it didn't do
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/192
NIFI-1107 Multipart Uploads
Re-integrate Multipart Upload changes into PutS3Object.
1. add Multipart upload logic to allow resuming an upload after
process/instance restart,
2. add local state
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/132#issuecomment-169329852
I'm closing this pull request since the general S3 changes have been
incorporated by @trkurc. The remaining Multipart Upload functionality will be
incorporated into a new
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/135#issuecomment-168806914
I just pushed changes that address these issues, including tests for these
and a couple more edge conditions. It has been squashed (thanks @trkurc) into
a single commit
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/145
NIFI-1300 - Penalize flowfiles when message send or commit exceptions occur
and mâ¦
â¦ake commit exception handler route to failure instead of rolling back.
Moved producer queue creation
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/135
NIFI-1118 Update SplitText Processor - add support for split size limâ¦
â¦its and header line markers.
1) Add "Maximum Fragment Size" property. A new split file will be created
i
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/113#issuecomment-159769035
Closed by commit 226ac64ef95f3d755dfbb3d5288ba98052855473 and
4c4d62c61f7c828dbcb124090992b91d631cb22e.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jskora closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/113
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/132
NIFI-1107 - Integrate Multipart uploads into the PutS3Object processor.
* Add nifi-ssl-context-service-nar to nifi-aws-nar pom.
* Add nifi-ssl-context-service-api to nifi-aws-processors pom
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/116#issuecomment-157970085
Do you need me to close the pull request?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/116#issuecomment-157484556
@apiri, the property value is compiled as a regex, any separators are in
the context of the regex.
I'm not sure I understand how the RegexValidator can evaluate
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/116#issuecomment-157510163
@apiri, that makes sense regarding the framework. But, in the meantime, it
would be an easy patch to add an exclusion list to UpdateAttributes to prevent
the deletes
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/121#discussion_r44967382
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-aws-bundle/nifi-aws-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/aws/s3/PutS3ObjectMultipart.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,550
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/116#issuecomment-157265254
Interesting. Before I enabled EL support, it had a
REGULAR_EXPRESSION_VALIDATOR which would have caught those. Is there a way to
validate a property that supports
Github user jskora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/116#issuecomment-157272302
@trkurc, this is not a problem fix but an enhancement based on discussion
that occurred on [NIFI-641|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-641]. It
seemed easy
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/121#discussion_r44714959
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-aws-bundle/nifi-aws-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/aws/s3/PutS3ObjectMultipart.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,550
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/113#discussion_r43743095
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ListFile.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,378
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/113#discussion_r43743209
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ListFile.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,378
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/113#discussion_r43744029
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ListFile.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,378
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/113#discussion_r43811658
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ListFile.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,378
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/113#discussion_r43822421
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ListFile.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,378
Github user jskora commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/113#discussion_r43823110
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ListFile.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,378
Github user jskora closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/112
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jskora reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/112
New ListFile processor.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jskora/nifi NIFI-631
Alternatively you can review and apply
GitHub user jskora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/112
New ListFile processor.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jskora/nifi NIFI-631
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes
97 matches
Mail list logo
