[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-08 Thread Joe Witt
Hello, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi 1.12.1. The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenifi-1167 The source being voted upon and the convenience binaries can be fou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-08 Thread Pierre Villard
+1 binding I deployed a secured cluster on GCP using my terraform scripts (with ZK 3.5.8) and I confirmed the SAN issue was addressed. Updated: https://github.com/pvillard31/nifi-gcp-terraform Le mar. 8 sept. 2020 à 19:00, Joe Witt a écrit : > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-08 Thread Sushil Kumar
+1 I tried with my helm chart. I wanted to test the issue I was facing with self-signed certificates generated via toolkit. On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 10:00 AM Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi > 1.12.1. > > The source zip, includ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-08 Thread Matt Burgess
+1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.12.1 Ran through the release helper and various flows. Thanks for RM'ing Joe! On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 1:00 PM Joe Witt wrote: > > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi > 1.12.1. > > The source zip, includi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-08 Thread Andy LoPresto
+1 (binding) Ran through normal release verification process and specifically checked the resolutions to NIFI-7730 [1] and NIFI-7767 [2]. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7730 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7767 Andy LoPresto alopre...@apache.org alopresto.apa...@

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-08 Thread rstjohn67
+1 non-binding Compiled with Corretto 1.8 Tested site-to-site from 1.11.4 -- Richard St. John, PhD Asymmetrik AGILITY | EXPERIENCE | RESULTS 308 Sentinel Drive, Suite 400 Annapolis Junction, MD 20701 On Sep 8, 2020, 1:00 PM -0400, Joe Witt , wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-08 Thread Andrew Lim
+1 (binding) -Ran full clean install on OS X (Catalina 10.15.2) -Tested secure NiFi with secure NiFi Registry 0.7.0 -Ran basic flows successfully; tested basic versioned flow functionality -Reviewed documentation updates Drew > On Sep 8, 2020, at 12:59 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > Hello, > > I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-09 Thread Bryan Bende
+1 (binding) Ran through the release helper and everything looks good, used 1.12.1 toolkit to generate certs for a secure instance. On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:36 PM Andrew Lim wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Ran full clean install on OS X (Catalina 10.15.2) > -Tested secure NiFi with secure NiFi Regi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-09 Thread Kevin Doran
+1 (binding) - Checked hashes/sigs - L&N is present - Built from source and built docker images from resulting artifacts - Ran a docker compose environment with NiFi Registry 0.7.0 and NiFi 1.12.1 RC1 - Tested flow authoring and Registry integration in the test environment One thing to note is th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-09 Thread Joey Frazee
+1 (non-binding) Verified checksums and signatures Ran full build with contrib check on Linux and Zulu OpenJDK 11.0.7 Tested TLS toolkit and secure cluster with multiple SANs -joey On Sep 9, 2020, 8:51 AM -0700, Kevin Doran , wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Checked hashes/sigs > - L&N is present > - B

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-10 Thread Peter Turcsanyi
+1 (non-binding) - verified checksums and signatures - built source (empty local maven repo, AdoptOpenJDK 1.8.0_265 on Ubuntu 18.04.5), start up the binary - untar and ran the convenience binary too - tested some simple flows, including NIFI-7760 (fixed regression in UnpackContent) Peter On Thu,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-10 Thread Chad Zobrisky
+1 (non-binding) - Verified checksums, signatures - Licenses + README looks good - built in wsl using java 8 - ran using docker image secured with a certificate that had multiple SANS and started up fine Chad On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:25 PM Peter Turcsanyi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - verif

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-11 Thread Kotaro Terada
+1 (non-binding) Verified signatures and hashes. Built packages with OpenJDK 1.8 and OpenJDK 11. Set up a secure 3-node cluster. Confirmed that the multiple SAN issue is resolved. Thanks, Kotaro On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:00 PM Chad Zobrisky wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Verified checksums,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-11 Thread Tony Kurc
+1 (binding) Built with openjdk 1.8, reviewed license,notice, and checked signature and hashes. On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 9:25 AM Kotaro Terada wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Verified signatures and hashes. > Built packages with OpenJDK 1.8 and OpenJDK 11. > Set up a secure 3-node cluster. > Confi

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

2020-09-11 Thread Joe Witt
Team, -1 (binding). Unfortunately the RC1 release is being cancelled due to an issue just reported in the general slack room. It relates to a version change of commons config done in [1]. The reporter of the issue is putting a JIRA together now. The build/tests didn't catch this so that will be

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-23 Thread Joe Witt
Hello, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi 1.12.1. The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenifi-1170 The source being voted upon and the convenience binaries can be fou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-23 Thread Andy LoPresto
+1, binding. Verified the checksums, the GPG signature, the LICENSE/NOTICE/README.md files, the full build, and started a simple node on Mac OS X 10.15.6. Specifically verified the results of NIFI-7804 [1] and examined the resulting nifi-security-utils and nifi-security-utils-api JAR files.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-24 Thread Andrew Lim
+1 (binding) -Ran full clean install on OS X (Catalina 10.15.2) -Tested secure NiFi with secure NiFi Registry 0.7.0 -Ran basic flows successfully; tested basic versioned flow functionality -Reviewed UI fixes and documentation updates Drew > On Sep 23, 2020, at 6:10 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > Hell

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-24 Thread Joey Frazee
+1 (non-binding) Verified checksums, hashes, signatures Ran full build w/ Java 1.8 and 11 Ran build w/ -Prpm profile Created secure cluster using tls-toolkit and multiple SANs Tested fixes for NIFI-7768 and NIFI-7794 -joey On Sep 24, 2020, 1:05 PM -0700, Andrew Lim , wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Ran

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-24 Thread Matt Burgess
+1 (binding) Ran through release helper, verified some simple flows, verified NIFI-7742 was included. Thanks for handling the release Joe! On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:10 PM Joe Witt wrote: > > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi > 1.12.1. > > The s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-24 Thread Robert Fellows
+1 (non-binding) Ran through the release helper. Built and ran with Java 11 (OpenJDK Runtime Environment AdoptOpenJDK (build 11.0.8+10)) On Mac OS 10.15.6 Tested a few simple flows. Thanks for RM'ing, Joe. -- Rob On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:24 PM Matt Burgess wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran thro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-25 Thread Kotaro Terada
+1 (non-binding) Verified signatures and hashes. Built with OpenJDK 1.8 and OpenJDK 11. Set up a secure 3-node cluster. Tested some dataflows. Confirmed that it works fine with multiple SAN. Thanks, Kotaro On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:45 AM Robert Fellows wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Ran throug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-25 Thread Tony Kurc
+1 (binding) Verified signature and hashes. Built without issue on ubuntu 18.04 x86_64 with openjdk11. Saw no issues with LICENSE or NOTICE. Tony On Wed, Sep 23, 2020, 6:10 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi > 1.12.1. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-25 Thread Pierre Villard
+1 (binding) Went through usual verification steps. Thanks Joe for RM'ing! Le ven. 25 sept. 2020 à 13:30, Tony Kurc a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Verified signature and hashes. Built without issue on ubuntu 18.04 x86_64 > with openjdk11. Saw no issues with LICENSE or NOTICE. > > Tony > > On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-26 Thread Peter Turcsanyi
+1 (non-binding) - verified checksums and signatures - built source (empty local maven repo, AdoptOpenJDK 1.8.0_265 on Ubuntu 20.04) - untar and ran the provided convenience binary - tested some simple flows, check NIFI-7794 (fixed regression in PutAzureBlobStorage) Peter On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-28 Thread Mark Payne
+1 (binding) During build, I did run into a problem with unit tests: [ERROR] Tests run: 12, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.399 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.nifi.web.security.oidc.StandardOidcIdentityProviderGroovyTest [ERROR] testConvertOIDCTokenToNiFiTokenShouldHandleB

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-28 Thread Joe Witt
+1 binding On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 9:20 AM Mark Payne wrote: > +1 (binding) > > During build, I did run into a problem with unit tests: > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 12, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.399 s <<< FAILURE! - in > org.apache.nifi.web.security.oidc.StandardOidcIdent

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

2020-09-28 Thread Joe Witt
Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to announce that the 1.12.1 release of Apache NiFi passes with 7 +1 (binding) votes 4 +1 (non-binding) votes 0 0 votes 0 -1 votes Thanks to everyone for their quick efforts to address a range of important defects and improvements! Here is the P