[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-09 Thread Aldrin Piri
Hello folks, The release passes with 4 +1 (binding) votes 1 +1 (non-binding) votes 1 +0 (non-binding) vote 0 -1 votes I will take care of completing the associated release processes. Thanks to all who helped make this release possible. Here is the PMC vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.o

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-09 Thread Aldrin Piri
Hello folks, The release passes with 4 +1 (binding) votes 1 +1 (non-binding) votes 1 +0 (non-binding) vote 0 -1 votes I will take care of completing the associated release processes. Thanks to all who helped make this release possible. Here is the PMC vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-09 Thread Aldrin Piri
Ah, good catches. There was a culling of dependencies to reduce overall assembly size and Quartz was likely a casualty of the Spring removal. The CRON support is an important one, and in maintaining some of the simpler functionalities that are in NiFi, think should also be available in MiNiFi. H

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-09 Thread Bryan Rosander
Hey Pierre, I agree with you on both points. 1. We should decide whether CRON support is worth the extra footprint and overhead of quartz. If so we should add it, if not we should catch that during validation. 2. I've already written up an issue for it. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MI

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-09 Thread Pierre Villard
Hi guys, +0 (non-binding) Checked signature and checksum. Built sources without issue. Used toolkit to convert template. And ran a template to exchange data between a MiNiFi instance and a NiFi instance. Great !! (under Windows 10 environment) Few remarks though (sorry if it has already been men

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-08 Thread Mark Payne
And since i originally replied to the helper thread instead of the VOTE thread... +1 (binding) Verified signature and checksums. Build completed without issue. Was able to use the minifi-toolkit to convert a nifi template and run it without any problem. All worked perfectly! Great job, guys!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-08 Thread Aldrin Piri
+1, binding Build, contrib, and associated documentation looks good. Hashes and signatures check out. Was able to use the generated assemblies to perform some tests and communicate with a NiFi instance. --- Folks, Thanks for all the feedback. I've created tickets to capture all of the points

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-08 Thread Andy LoPresto
My +1 vote from the other day is now binding. Andy LoPresto alopre...@apache.org alopresto.apa...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D EF69 > On Jul 8, 2016, at 9:12 AM, Joe Witt wrote: > > +1 binding. > > Ran through full build verification. Check licensin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-08 Thread Joe Witt
+1 binding. Ran through full build verification. Check licensing/notice items and hoping we can make that leaner and meaner over time as well. Was able to use the toolkit to convert a nifi template to a minifi config and fire that up and immediately see desired results. Some feedback items. 1)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-08 Thread Bryan Rosander
+1 (non-binding) Downloaded RC, verified checksums, gpg. Built with contrib-check turned on. Ran through all templates at https://github.com/brosander/minifi-testkit/tree/8a8b9791a6b3d6404d6eaa6be48951851d3fa898/templates (ran config.sh transform on each template to generate yaml, ran MiNiFi wit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-08 Thread Joe Percivall
+1 (binding) Ran through the helper and verified functionality. - - - - - - Joseph Percivall linkedin.com/in/Percivall e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com On Thursday, July 7, 2016 2:13 PM, Joe Percivall wrote: Vote forth-coming but regarding Andy's notes/questions: I agree with using HTTPS links

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-07 Thread Joe Percivall
Vote forth-coming but regarding Andy's notes/questions: I agree with using HTTPS links when possible in both files and the couple README.md changes. I don't think there are any plans currently for separate mailing lists/IRC nodes. I am in favor of keeping NiFi and MiNiFi together for now to buil

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-06 Thread Andy LoPresto
Hi, I verified the GPG signature and all hash signatures. Contrib check ran fine. I used one of the example config.yml files in the System Admin Guide and deployed it to the compiled binary. The tool ran successfully and wrote to a log file on my system. I have a couple notes about the release

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.0.1 (RC1)

2016-07-06 Thread Aldrin Piri
Hello Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi - MiNiFi, minifi-0.0.1. The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenifi-1087 The Git tag is minifi-0.0.1-R